Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31691766›Full record

ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina

Mammary adenectomy followed by immediate reconstruction for treatment of patients with early-infiltrating breast carcinoma: a cohort study.

Alfredo Carlos Simões Dornellas de Barros, Heloísa Andrade Carvalho, Felipe Eduardo Martins Andrade, Cristiane da Costa Bandeira Abrahão Nimir, Marcelo Moura Costa Sampaio, Fabiana Baroni Makdissi, Max Senna Mano

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alfredo Carlos Simões Dornellas de BarrosMD, PhD. Breast Surgeon, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-3040
Heloísa Andrade CarvalhoMD, PhD. Radiation Oncologist, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0979-7768
Felipe Eduardo Martins AndradeMD. Breast Surgeon, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-0053
Cristiane da Costa Bandeira Abrahão NimirMD. Pathologist, Laboratório Diagnostika, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3341-9321
Marcelo Moura Costa SampaioMD, MSc. Plastic Surgeon, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6365-3901
Fabiana Baroni MakdissiMD, PhD. Breast Surgeon, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4442-0870
Max Senna ManoMD, PhD. Oncologist, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5666-5261
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of mammary adenectomy for breast carcinoma treatment remains controversial.

objectiveThis study aimed to verify the oncological safety of mammary adenectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for treating selected patients with infiltrating breast carcinoma and to evaluate patients' satisfaction with the reconstructed breasts. DESIGN AND

settingCohort study conducted among patients treated at Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.

methodsThis study was based on 152 selected patients (161 operated breasts) with infiltrating breast carcinoma who underwent mammary adenectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. In all patients, the diameter of the largest focus of the tumor was less than 3.0 cm, the imaging tumor-nipple distance was greater than 2.0 cm and the pathological assessment showed clear margins. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. After at least one year of follow-up, 64 patients were asked about their satisfaction with the reconstructed breast(s).

resultsAt a mean follow-up time of 43.5 months, seven cases of LR (4.4%), four distant metastases (2.6%) and five deaths (3.3%) were recorded. The five-year actuarial LR-free survival, RFS and OS were 97.6%, 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. No cases of nipple-areolar complex recurrence were reported. Forty-one patients (64%) indicated a high level of satisfaction with the reconstructed breasts.

conclusionsMammary adenectomy is a safe and efficacious procedure for selected patients with early-infiltrating breast carcinoma and results in a high rate of patient satisfaction with the reconstructed breasts.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31691766
PMCPMC9744021
OpenAlexW2982388581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.