Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31691526›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Association between PSA values and surveillance quality after prostate cancer surgery.

Christina Hunter Chapman, Megan E V Caram, Archana Radhakrishnan, Alexander Tsodikov, Curtiland Deville, Jennifer Burns, Alexander Zaslavsky, Michael Chang, John T Leppert, Timothy Hofer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Refinement of Clinical Tumor Marker Monitoring: Why Not Use an Inverse Value of Doubling Time?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christina Hunter ChapmanCenter for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-5398
Megan E V CaramCenter for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1597-5428
Archana RadhakrishnanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alexander TsodikovDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Curtiland DevilleDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-6486
Jennifer BurnsCenter for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alexander ZaslavskyDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael ChangHunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
John T LeppertCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Timothy HoferCenter for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anne E SalesCenter for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sarah T HawleyCenter for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-645X
Brent K HollenbeckDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ted A SkolarusCenter for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Tissue/InformaticsP50CA186786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Timothy Dess · 2014 to 2026
$27.6M
De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancerR37CA222885 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SAINI, SAMEER DEV, SKOLARUS, TED ALBERT · 2018 to 2023
$3.6M
Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Medicare Expenditures for Outpatient ProceduresR01HS018726 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLENBECK, BRENT K. · 2010 to 2013
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS18726NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186786NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222885VA HSR&D Career Development 2 (CDA 12-171)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is used for prostate cancer detection and posttreatment surveillance, thresholds in these settings differ. The screening cutoff of 4.0 ng/mL may be inappropriately used during postsurgery surveillance, where 0.2 ng/mL is typically used, creating missed opportunities for effective salvage radiation treatment. We performed a study to determine whether guideline concordance with annual postoperative PSA surveillance increases when PSA values exceed 4 ng/mL, which represents a screening threshold that is not relevant after surgery.

methodsWe used US Veterans Health Administration data to perform a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of men diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer from 2005 to 2008 who underwent radical prostatectomy. We used logistic regression to examine the association between postoperative PSA levels and receipt of an annual PSA test.

resultsAmong 10 400 men and 38 901 person-years of follow-up, annual guideline concordance decreased from 95% in year 1 to 79% in year 7. After adjustment, guideline concordance was lower for the youngest and oldest men, Black, and unmarried men. Guideline concordance significantly increased as PSA exceeded 4 ng/mL (adjusted odds ratio 2.20 PSA > 4-6 ng/mL vs PSA > 1-4 ng/mL, 95% confidence interval 1.20-4.03; P = .01).

conclusionsGuideline concordance with prostate cancer surveillance increased when PSA values exceeded 4 ng/mL, suggesting a screening threshold not relevant after prostate cancer surgery, where 0.2 ng/mL is considered treatment failure, is impacting cancer surveillance quality. Clarification of PSA thresholds for early detection vs cancer surveillance, as well as emphasizing adherence for younger and Black men, appears warranted.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAgedGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalOdds RatioPrognosisProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsPublic Health SurveillanceTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigenmass screeningprostatectomyprostate-specific antigenprostatic neoplasmssurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID31691526
PMCPMC6912050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.