Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31691488›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2020

Machine Learning of Discriminative Gate Locations for Clinical Diagnosis.

Disi Ji, Preston Putzel, Yu Qian, Ivan Chang, Aishwarya Mandava, Richard H Scheuermann, Jack D Bui, Huan-You Wang, Padhraic Smyth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Disi JiDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California.
Preston PutzelDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0940-4071
Yu QianInformatics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California.
Ivan ChangInformatics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California.
Aishwarya MandavaInformatics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California.
Richard H ScheuermannInformatics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California.
Jack D BuiDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Huan-You WangDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Padhraic SmythDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California.

Funding

Transformative Computational Infrastructures for Cell-Based Biomarker DiagnosticsU01TR001801 · NCATS · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI QIAN, YU, SCHEUERMANN, RICHARD H · 2016 to 2020
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR001801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput single-cell cytometry technologies have significantly improved our understanding of cellular phenotypes to support translational research and the clinical diagnosis of hematological and immunological diseases. However, subjective and ad hoc manual gating analysis does not adequately handle the increasing volume and heterogeneity of cytometry data for optimal diagnosis. Prior work has shown that machine learning can be applied to classify cytometry samples effectively. However, many of the machine learning classification results are either difficult to interpret without using characteristics of cell populations to make the classification, or suboptimal due to the use of inaccurate cell population characteristics derived from gating boundaries. To date, little has been done to optimize both the gating boundaries and the diagnostic accuracy simultaneously. In this work, we describe a fully discriminative machine learning approach that can simultaneously learn feature representations (e.g., combinations of coordinates of gating boundaries) and classifier parameters for optimizing clinical diagnosis from cytometry measurements. The approach starts from an initial gating position and then refines the position of the gating boundaries by gradient descent until a set of globally-optimized gates across different samples are achieved. The learning procedure is constrained by regularization terms encoding domain knowledge that encourage the algorithm to seek interpretable results. We evaluate the proposed approach using both simulated and real data, producing classification results on par with those generated via human expertise, in terms of both the positions of the gating boundaries and the diagnostic accuracy. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningFlow CytometryHumansautomated gatingcancer diagnosischronic lymphocytic leukemiadiscriminative gatesflow cytometrysupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID31691488
PMCPMC7079150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.