Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31691459›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2020

Out-of-home care in childhood and biomedical risk factors in middle-age: National birth cohort study.

Carlos de Mestral, Steven Bell, Mark Hamer, George David Batty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Out-of-home care in childhood and biomedical risk factors in middle-age: National birth cohort study.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos de MestralDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0237-882X
Steven BellDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6774-3149
Mark HamerDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-7992
George David BattyDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-5753

Funding

Healthy transitions from mid-life to early older age: biomedical follow-up of 1958 Birth Cohort Study members at age 60R01AG052519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · PI BATTY, DAVID, GOODMAN, ALISSA · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Healthy transitions from mid-life to early older age: biomedical follow-up of 1958 Birth Cohort Study members at age 60R56AG052519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · PI BATTY, DAVID, GOODMAN, ALISSA · 2016 to 2016
$500k
British Heart Foundation RG/18/13/33946NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052519NIA NIH HHS R56 AG052519UK Medical Research Council MR/P023444/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith there being an apparent impact of experience of out-of-home care in childhood on chronic disease and mortality, we examined how such adversity might be embodied such that it has a measurable impact on human biology, so mediating this relationship.

methodsWe used data from the UK National Child Development Study in which exposure to public care was prospectively gathered on three occasions up to age 16. Study members also participated in a social survey at age 42 and a clinical examination at age 44/45 when cardiovascular, inflammatory, neuroendocrine, and respiratory risk markers for mortality were collected, 19 of which were included as endpoints in the present analyses.

resultsOf the 8012 participants in the biomedical survey, 4% (n = 322) had been in care at some point in childhood and/or adolescence. We found the expected marked differences in the early life characteristics of poverty, health, and disability in children with experience of public care relative to their unexposed counterparts. After controlling for these confounding factors, however, care in childhood was essentially unrelated to biomarkers in middle-age. We also found no consistent links between these biomarkers and the duration, timing, or type of care.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the biomarkers captured in the present study are unlikely to mediate the link between public care in childhood and later chronic disease or mortality. Processes involving mental health, socioeconomic position, and health behaviors would seem to be a potential alternative pathway warranting investigation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCardiovascular DiseasesChildFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory Tract DiseasesRisk FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID31691459
PMCPMC7317568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.