Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31691276›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Prospective development of a patient-reported outcomes instrument for desmoid tumors or aggressive fibromatosis.

Mrinal M Gounder, LeAnne Maddux, Jean Paty, Thomas M Atkinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. GOunder/Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation DEsmoid Symptom/Impact Scale (GODDESSQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Trial
  2. Nirogacestat, a γ-Secretase Inhibitor for Desmoid Tumors.The New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Desmoid Tumors: A Comprehensive Review.Advances in therapy · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety, and depression in patients with desmoid type fibromatosis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mrinal M GounderMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
LeAnne MadduxIQVIA, New York, New York.
Jean PatyIQVIA, New York, New York.
Thomas M AtkinsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-4965-3913
IQVIA (United States) · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDesmoid tumors (or aggressive fibromatosis) are locally infiltrative connective-tissue tumors that can arise in any anatomic location; they can be asymptomatic, or they can result in pain, deformity, swelling, and loss of mobility and/or threaten visceral organs with bowel perforation, hydronephrosis, neurovascular damage, and other complications. Existing clinical trial endpoints such as the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) and progression-free survival are inadequate in capturing treatment efficacy. This study was designed to develop a novel clinical trial endpoint by capturing patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

methodsFollowing best practices in qualitative methodology, this study used concept elicitation (CE) interviews to explore desmoid patients' perspectives on key disease-related symptoms and impacts. Qualitative analysis was performed to determine the relative frequency and disturbance of symptoms and impacts as well as other characteristics of these concepts. A draft PRO scale was then developed and tested with cognitive interviewing. Information from the interviews was subsequently incorporated into the refined PRO scale.

resultsCE interviews with desmoid patients (n = 31) helped to identify salient concepts and led to a draft scale that included symptom and impact scales. Cognitive interviews were completed with additional patients (n = 15) across 3 phases. Patient input was used to refine instructions, revise and/or remove items, and modify the response scale. This resulted in an 11-item symptom scale and a 17-item impact scale.

conclusionsThis is the first disease-specific PRO instrument developed for desmoid tumors. The instrument is available as an exploratory endpoint in clinical trials. This study highlights the feasibility and challenges of developing PRO instruments for rare diseases.

Indexed as

AdultDesmoid TumorsFemaleHumansHydronephrosisMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesPsychometricsQuality of LifeResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationclinical outcome assessmentsdrug development toolFood and Drug Administration (FDA) patient-reported outcome (PRO) guidanceneoplasmspatient-centered outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31691276
PMCPMC6980244
OpenAlexW2989223134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.