Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31691160›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2020

Supervised machine learning for diagnostic classification from large-scale neuroimaging datasets.

Pradyumna Lanka, D Rangaprakash, Michael N Dretsch, Jeffrey S Katz, Thomas S Denney, Gopikrishna Deshpande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pradyumna LankaAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, 560 Devall Dr., Suite 266D, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-5928
D RangaprakashAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, 560 Devall Dr., Suite 266D, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Michael N DretschU.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, USA.
Jeffrey S KatzAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, 560 Devall Dr., Suite 266D, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Thomas S DenneyAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, 560 Devall Dr., Suite 266D, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Gopikrishna DeshpandeAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, 560 Devall Dr., Suite 266D, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA. gopi@auburn.edu.

Funding

Crossmodal Correspondences Between Visual and Auditory FeaturesR01EY025978 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DESHPANDE, GOPIKRISHNA, NYGAARD, LYNNE C · 2015 to 2017
$1.8M
Translational Developmental Neuroscience of AutismK23MH087770 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DI MARTINO, ADRIANA · 2010 to 2013
$644k
Enhancement of the 1000 Functional Connectome ProjectR03MH096321 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN, MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER · 2012 to 2013
$158k
Medical Research and Materiel Command () 00007218NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025978NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH087770NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH096321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are growing concerns about the generalizability of machine learning classifiers in neuroimaging. In order to evaluate this aspect across relatively large heterogeneous populations, we investigated four disorders: Autism spectrum disorder (N = 988), Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (N = 930), Post-traumatic stress disorder (N = 87) and Alzheimer's disease (N = 132). We applied 18 different machine learning classifiers (based on diverse principles) wherein the training/validation and the hold-out test data belonged to samples with the same diagnosis but differing in either the age range or the acquisition site. Our results indicate that overfitting can be a huge problem in heterogeneous datasets, especially with fewer samples, leading to inflated measures of accuracy that fail to generalize well to the general clinical population. Further, different classifiers tended to perform well on different datasets. In order to address this, we propose a consensus-classifier by combining the predictive power of all 18 classifiers. The consensus-classifier was less sensitive to unmatched training/validation and holdout test data. Finally, we combined feature importance scores obtained from all classifiers to infer the discriminative ability of connectivity features. The functional connectivity patterns thus identified were robust to the classification algorithm used, age and acquisition site differences, and had diagnostic predictive ability in addition to univariate statistically significant group differences between the groups. A MATLAB toolbox called Machine Learning in NeuroImaging (MALINI), which implements all the 18 different classifiers along with the consensus classifier is available from Lanka et al. (2019) The toolbox can also be found at the following URL: https://github.com/pradlanka/malini .

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingSupervised Machine LearningADHDAlzheimer’s diseaseAutismDiagnostic classificationFunctional connectivityPTSDResting-state functional MRISupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID31691160
PMCPMC7198352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.