Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690888›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2019

Unravelling cellular relationships during development and regeneration using genetic lineage tracing.

Chloé S Baron, Alexander van Oudenaarden

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Diagnosis and Discovery Enabled by Large Language Models.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Advances in CRISPR-Cas9 in lineage tracing of model animals.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chloé S BaronOncode Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Alexander van OudenaardenOncode Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands. a.vanoudenaarden@hubrecht.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-3551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking the progeny of single cells is necessary for building lineage trees that recapitulate processes such as embryonic development and stem cell differentiation. In classical lineage tracing experiments, cells are fluorescently labelled to allow identification by microscopy of a limited number of cell clones. To track a larger number of clones in complex tissues, fluorescent proteins are now replaced by heritable DNA barcodes that are read using next-generation sequencing. In prospective lineage tracing, unique DNA barcodes are introduced into single cells through genetic manipulation (using, for example, Cre-mediated recombination or CRISPR-Cas9-mediated editing) and tracked over time. Alternatively, in retrospective lineage tracing, naturally occurring somatic mutations can be used as endogenous DNA barcodes. Finally, single-cell mRNA-sequencing datasets that capture different cell states within a developmental or differentiation trajectory can be used to recapitulate lineages. In this Review, we discuss methods for prospective or retrospective lineage tracing and demonstrate how trajectory reconstruction algorithms can be applied to single-cell mRNA-sequencing datasets to infer developmental or differentiation tracks. We discuss how these approaches are used to understand cell fate during embryogenesis, cell differentiation and tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRegeneration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.