Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690828›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020

The genetics of human ageing.

David Melzer, Luke C Pilling, Luigi Ferrucci

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 222 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
222citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

222 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 358 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolutionary genetics of ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The association of frailty with age and lifespan in mice differs by strain and sex.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

162 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David MelzerMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. d.melzer@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-3838
Luke C PillingMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Luigi FerrucciNational Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Connecticut · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999Medical Research Council MR/M008924/1Medical Research Council MR/M023095/1Medical Research Council MRS009892/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past two centuries have witnessed an unprecedented rise in human life expectancy. Sustaining longer lives with reduced periods of disability will require an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of ageing, and genetics is a powerful tool for identifying these mechanisms. Large-scale genome-wide association studies have recently identified many loci that influence key human ageing traits, including lifespan. Multi-trait loci have been linked with several age-related diseases, suggesting shared ageing influences. Mutations that drive accelerated ageing in prototypical progeria syndromes in humans point to an important role for genome maintenance and stability. Together, these different strands of genetic research are highlighting pathways for the discovery of anti-ageing interventions that may be applicable in humans.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLongevityMutationPhenotypeReproduction

Identifiers

PMID31690828
PMCPMC9934000
OpenAlexW2988912149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.