ArticleScientific reports2019
Color preference of the spotted wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fruit Damage Alters Headspace Volatile Chemistry and Host Attraction in Drosophila suzukii.Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Article
- Winter fruit contribution to the performance of the invasive fruit fly Drosophila suzukii under different thermal regimes.Insect science · 2026Article
- Ecofriendly control of Drosophila suzukii via the photoinsecticide chlorophyllin.Pest management science · 2025Article
- Olfactory variation among closely related cactophilic Drosophila species.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025Article
- Directional selection failed to produce changes in olfactory Y-maze learning and memory but induced changes in climbing phenotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Shaping the environment -iScience · 2024Article
- Oviposition Preference and Developmental Performance ofInsects · 2024Article
- An advanced metabolomic approach on grape skins untangles cultivar preferences byFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Effect of Ultraviolet-B RadiatingInsects · 2023Article
- Comparison of multimodal attract-and-kill formulations for managing Drosophila suzukii: Behavioral and lethal effects.PloS one · 2023Article
- Alterations in lifespan and sleep:wake duration under selective monochromes of visible light in Drosophila melanogaster.Biology open · 2022Article
- Mass TrappingInsects · 2022Article
- A novel setup for simultaneous two-photon functional imaging and precise spectral and spatial visual stimulation in Drosophila.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae) is a significant invasive pest in soft-skin fruits and berries in Asia, Europe, and North and South America. Many herbivorous insects use multiple cues for host selection, particularly olfactory and visual stimuli. The visual system of closely-related Drosophila melanogaster is well-documented, expressing strong sensitivity to short-wavelength colors (ultraviolet to green) and only limited sensitivity to long-wavelength colors (red to infrared). Our results suggest that D. suzukii have limited ability to distinguish red consistent with visual sensitivity range within the melanogaster subgroup. We propose that color contrast rather than color appearance may be of greater importance in orientation and attraction. We propose that differences in reflectance between light wavelengths important for color opponency are key to color discrimination to provide color contrast between foreground and background, as occurs between fruit and foliage, during host-finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.