Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690561›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019

Internet based vestibular rehabilitation with and without physiotherapy support for adults aged 50 and older with a chronic vestibular syndrome in general practice: three armed randomised controlled trial.

Vincent A van Vugt, Johannes C van der Wouden, Rosie Essery, Lucy Yardley, Jos W R Twisk, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Otto R Maarsingh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04979598 (Unravelling Risk Factors for Chronic Dizziness in Patients After an Acute Unilateral Vestibular Deafferentiation Syndrome.), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04979598 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Unravelling Risk Factors for Chronic Dizziness in Patients After an Acute Unilateral Vestibular Deafferentiation Syndrome.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversiteit AntwerpenRan2021 to 2024Enrolled103ConditionsAcute Unilateral Vestibular DeafferentiationArmsHome exercise program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Online vestibular rehabilitation for chronic vestibular syndrome: 36-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent A van VugtDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands v.vanvugt@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2746-4820
Johannes C van der WoudenDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rosie EsseryDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Lucy YardleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Henriëtte E van der HorstDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Otto R MaarsinghDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Southampton · GBAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of stand alone and blended internet based vestibular rehabilitation (VR) in the management of chronic vestibular syndromes in general practice.

designPragmatic, three armed, parallel group, individually randomised controlled trial.

setting59 general practices in the Netherlands.

participants322 adults aged 50 and older with a chronic vestibular syndrome.

interventionsStand alone VR comprising a six week, internet based intervention with weekly online sessions and daily exercises (10-20 minutes a day). In the blended VR group, the same internet based intervention was supplemented by face-to-face physiotherapy support (home visits in weeks 1 and 3). Participants in the usual care group received standard care from a general practitioner, without any restrictions.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was vestibular symptoms after six months as measured by the vertigo symptom scale-short form (VSS-SF range 0-60, clinically relevant difference ≥3 points). Secondary outcomes were dizziness related impairment, anxiety, depressive symptoms, subjective improvement of vestibular symptoms after three and six months, and adverse events.

resultsIn the intention-to-treat analysis, participants in the stand alone and blended VR groups had lower VSS-SF scores at six months than participants in the usual care group (adjusted mean difference -4.1 points, 95% confidence interval -5.8 to -2.5; and -3.5 points, -5.1 to -1.9, respectively). Similar differences in VSS-SF scores were seen at three months follow-up. Participants in the stand alone and blended VR groups also experienced less dizziness related impairment, less anxiety, and more subjective improvement of vestibular symptoms at three and six months. No serious adverse events related to online VR occurred during the trial.

conclusionStand alone and blended internet based VR are clinically effective and safe interventions to treat adults aged 50 and older with a chronic vestibular syndrome. Online VR is an easily accessible form of treatment, with the potential to improve care for an undertreated group of patients in general practice.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR5712.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesQuality of LifeAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSyndromeTelemedicineTreatment OutcomeVestibular Diseases

Identifiers

PMID31690561
PMCPMC6829201
OpenAlexW2989418904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.