Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690509›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[Peripheral nerve block and rebound pain: literature review].

Layana Vieira Nobre, Graziella Prianti Cunha, Paulo César Castello Branco de Sousa, Alexandre Takeda, Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06431906 (TRANSDERMAL FENTANYL AS A FORM OF REBOUND PAIN REDUCTION IN FAST TRACK PROGRAMME IN PRIMARY KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. Prospective Observational Non-inferiority Study Versus Morphine PCA.), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06431906 unknown statusnot on this map

TRANSDERMAL FENTANYL AS A FORM OF REBOUND PAIN REDUCTION IN FAST TRACK PROGRAMME IN PRIMARY KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. Prospective Observational Non-inferiority Study Versus Morphine PCA.

TypeobservationalSponsorOscar Diaz-CambroneroRan2024 to 2026Enrolled106ConditionsPostoperative Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Layana Vieira NobreUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Grupo de Anestesia Regional Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Dor e Medicina Intensiva, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Graziella Prianti CunhaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Grupo de Anestesia Regional Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Dor e Medicina Intensiva, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Paulo César Castello Branco de SousaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Grupo de Anestesia Regional Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Dor e Medicina Intensiva, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Alexandre TakedaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Grupo de Anestesia Regional Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Dor e Medicina Intensiva, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Leonardo Henrique Cunha FerraroUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Grupo de Anestesia Regional Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Dor e Medicina Intensiva, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Electronic address: leohcferraro1@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTo investigate, describe, and assess the phenomenon of "rebound pain" as a clinically relevant problem in anesthetic practice. CONTENT: The phenomenon of "rebound pain" has been demonstrated and described as a very severe pain, which occurs after a peripheral nerve block resolution with the recovery of sensitivity. The incidence of rebound pain is unknown. Usually, it occurs between 12 to 24hours after surgery and adversely affecting sleep quality. It is not yet possible to establish a mechanism as a definitive cause or trigger factor of rebound pain. Studies suggest that rebound pain is a side effect of peripheral nerve blocks, despite their effectiveness in pain control. Currently, the extent and clinical significance of rebound pain cannot be well determined due to the lack of large prospective studies.

conclusionRebound pain assessment should always be considered in clinical practice, as it is not a rare side effect of peripheral nerve blocks. There are still many challenging questions to be answered about rebound pain, so large prospective studies are needed to address the issue. For prevention, the use of peripheral nerve block techniques that avoid nerve damage and adequate perioperative analgesia associated with patient education on the early administration of analgesics, even during the period of analgesia provided by peripheral nerve block, is recommended. A better understanding of the "rebound pain" phenomenon, its pathophysiology, associated risk factors, and long-term consequences may help in developing more effective preventive strategies.

Indexed as

HumansNerve BlockPainPain MeasurementPatient Education as TopicPostoperative PainRisk FactorsBloqueio nervosoDor pós‐operatóriaEfeito reboteNerve blockNervos periféricosPeripheral nervesPostoperative painRebound effect

Identifiers

PMID31690509
PMCPMC9391878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.