Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690479›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of internal medicine2020

Diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies among Italian emergency and intensive care departments. Results from an Italian survey: Progetto GEAR (Gestione dell'Emergenza e urgenza in ARea critica).

F Saladini, C Mancusi, F Bertacchini, F Spannella, A Maloberti, A Giavarini, M Rosticci, R M Bruno, G Pucci, D Grassi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Preliminary results of an ongoing multicentric prospective study on hypertensive emergencies and urgencies in Italy.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  9. Hypertensive emergencies and urgencies: a preliminary report of the ongoing Italian multicentric study ERIDANO.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Case report: Area of focus in a case of malignant hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How should we treat very high blood pressure until we distinguish between hypertensive emergency and urgency?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  19. Hypertension Urgencies and Emergencies: The GEAR Project.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

F SaladiniDepartment of Medicine, University of Padova, Italy; Cardiology Unit, Cittadella Town Hospital, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: saladinifrancesca@gmail.com.
C MancusiHypertension Research Center, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, Federico II University of Naples, Italy.
F BertacchiniInternal Medicine, University of Brescia-ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Italy.
F SpannellaInternal Medicine and Geriatrics, IRCCS-INRCA, Ancona, Italy; Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, University "Politecnica delle Marche", Ancona, Italy.
A MalobertiCardiology 4, ASST Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Milan, Italy.
A GiavariniCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy.
M RosticciMedicine and Surgery Sciences Department, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy.
R M BrunoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
G PucciInternal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Terni University Hospital, Italy.
D GrassiDepartment of Internal medicine and Public Health, University of Aquila, Italy.
M PengoDepartment of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano, Italy.
M L MuiesanInternal Medicine, University of Brescia-ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertensive emergencies (HE) and urgencies (HU) are frequent causes of patients referral to Emergency Department (ED) and the approach may be different according to local clinical practice. Our aim was to explore awareness, management, treatment and counselling after discharge of HE and HU in Italy, by mean of an on-line survey. The young investigator research group of the Italian Society of Hypertension developed a 23-item questionnaire spread by e-mail invitation to the members of Italian Scientific societies in the field of Hypertension. 665 questionnaires were collected from EDs, Emergency and Urgency Medicine, Cardiology or Coronary Units, Internal Medicines, Intensive care, Stroke units. Symptoms considered suspicious of acute organ damage were: chest pain (89.0%), visual disturbances (89.8%), dyspnoea (82.7%), headache (82.1%), dizziness (52.0%), conjunctival haemorrhages (41.5%), tinnitus (38.2%) and epistaxis (34.4%). Exams more frequent prescribed were: electrocardiogram (97.2%), serum creatinine (91.4%), markers of cardiomyocyte necrosis (66.2%), echocardiography (65.1%). The use of intravenous or oral medications to treat HEs was 94.7% and 3.5%, while for HUs 24.4% and 70.8% respectively. Of note, a surprisingly high percentage of physicians (22 % overall, 24.5% in North Italy) used to prescribe sublingual nifedipine. After discharge, home blood pressure monitoring and general practitioner re-evaluation were more frequently suggested, while ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and hypertension specialist examination were less prescribed. The differences observed across the different macro-areas, regarded prescription of diagnostic test and drug administration. This survey depicts a complex situation of shades and lights in the real-life management of HE and HU in Italy.

Indexed as

EmergenciesHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCritical CareEmergency Service, HospitalHumansItalyAntihypertensive AgentsHypertension emergencyHypertension urgencyManagementSurveyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31690479
OpenAlexW2984127714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.