Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690332›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Characterisation of Anopheles strains used for laboratory screening of new vector control products.

Jessica Williams, Lori Flood, Giorgio Praulins, Victoria A Ingham, John Morgan, Rosemary Susan Lees, Hilary Ranson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synergistic action of different molecular mechanisms causes striking levels of insecticide resistance in the malaria vectorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Machine learning reveals immediate disruption in mosquito flight when exposed to Olyset nets.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. IsCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica WilliamsDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Jessica.Williams@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4416-5117
Lori FloodDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Giorgio PraulinsDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Victoria A InghamDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
John MorganDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Rosemary Susan LeesDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Hilary RansonDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsecticides formulated into products that target Anopheles mosquitos have had an immense impact on reducing malaria cases in Africa. However, resistance to currently used insecticides is spreading rapidly and there is an urgent need for alternative public health insecticides. Potential new insecticides must be screened against a range of characterized mosquito strains to identify potential resistance liabilities. The Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine maintains three susceptible and four resistant Anopheles strains that are widely used for screening for new insecticides. The properties of these strains are described in this paper.

methodsWHO tube susceptibility bioassays were used for colony selection and to screen for resistance to the major classes of public health insecticides. Topical and tarsal contact bioassays were used to produce dose response curves to assess resistance intensity. Bioassays with the synergist piperonyl butoxide were also performed. Taqman™ assays were used to screen for known target site resistance alleles (kdr and ace-1). RT-qPCR was used to quantify expression of genes associated with pyrethroid resistance.

resultsPyrethroid selection pressure has maintained resistance to this class in all four resistant strains. Some carbamate and organophosphate resistance has been lost through lack of exposure to these insecticide classes. The Anopheles gambiae (sensu lato) strains, VK7 2014, Banfora M and Tiassalé 13 have higher levels of pyrethroid resistance than the An. funestus FUMOZ-R strain. Elevated expression of P450s is found in all four strains and the 1014F kdr mutation is present in all three An. gambiae strains at varying frequencies. Tarsal contact data and overexpression of CYP4G16 and SAP2 suggest penetration barriers and/or sequestration also confer resistance in Banfora M.

conclusionsContinual selection with deltamethrin has maintained a stable pyrethroid-resistant phenotype over many generations. In conjunction with a standardized rearing regime, this ensures quality control of strains over time allowing for robust product comparison and selection of optimal products for further development. The identification of multiple mechanisms underpinning insecticide resistance highlights the importance of screening new compounds against a range of mosquito strains.

Indexed as

InsecticidesAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnophelesBiological AssayCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDNADose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGenotyping TechniquesInsecticide ResistanceMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPoint MutationPyrethrinsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDNAInsecticidesPyrethrinsAnophelesInsecticideMalariaProduct screeningResistance genotypesResistance phenotypesVector control

Identifiers

PMID31690332
PMCPMC6833243
OpenAlexW2986202954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.