Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690185›Full record

ArticlePopulation studies2020

Fertility intentions and maternal health behaviour during and after pregnancy.

Esha Chatterjee, Christie Sennott

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esha ChatterjeeUniversity of Maryland.
Christie SennottPurdue University.ORCID 0000-0002-3760-6271
Purdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

INDIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SURVEYR01HD041455 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI DESAI, SONALDE B. · 2003 to 2023
$11.0M
Sci-Tech Core-Maryland Population Research CenterP2CHD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Susan W Parker · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041041NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD041455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines associations between fertility intentions and maternal health behaviours during and after pregnancy among a nationally representative sample of 3,442 women from India. Two waves of data (2005, 2012) from the India Human Development Survey were analyzed to investigate the influence of unwanted births on women's use of antenatal care, timely postnatal care, and the delivery setting using binary and ordered logistic regression, partial proportional odds models, and propensity score weighting. Fifty-eight per cent of sample births were unwanted. Regression results show that, net of maternal and household characteristics, women with unwanted births were less likely to obtain any antenatal care and had fewer antenatal tests performed. Unwantedness was also associated with a lower likelihood of delivering in an institutional setting and of obtaining timely postnatal care. The relationships between unwantedness and antenatal care, postnatal care, and delivery setting were robust to models accounting for propensity weighting.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaLogistic ModelsPostnatal CarePregnancyPrenatal CarePropensity ScoreReproductive BehaviorRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsUrban Populationchild healthfertilityfertility intentionshealth behaviourIndiamaternal health

Identifiers

PMID31690185
PMCPMC6980985
OpenAlexW2985670998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.