Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31690151›Full record

Trial reportInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2020

The RISE trial: A Randomized Trial on Intra-Saccular Endobridge devices.

Jean Raymond, Anne-Christine Januel, Daniela Iancu, Daniel Roy, Alain Weill, Andrew Carlson, Tim E Darsaut

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A new era in the treatment of wide necked bifurcation aneurysms: Intrasaccular flow disruption.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean RaymondDepartment of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1982-3480
Anne-Christine JanuelDepartment of Neuroradiology, Service de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique du CHU de Toulouse, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Daniela IancuDepartment of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Daniel RoyDepartment of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alain WeillDepartment of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Andrew CarlsonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Tim E DarsautDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta hospital, Mackenzie Health Sciences Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) are a difficult subset of aneurysms to successfully repair endovascularly, and a number of treatment adjuncts have been designed to improve on the results of coiling, including stenting and flow diversion of the parent vessel. Surgical clipping is commonly performed for certain WNBAs, such as middle cerebral aneurysms, in some centres. Intra-saccular flow diversion (ISFD) using the Woven Endo-Bridge (WEB) or similar devices, has been developed as a new endovascular alternative to coiling for WNBAs. Meta-analyses of case series suggest satisfactory results, both in terms of safety and efficacy, but in the absence of randomized evidence, whether ISFD leads to better outcomes for patients with WNBA remains unknown. There is a need to offer ISFD within the context of a randomized care trial.

methodsThe proposed trial is a multicentre, randomized controlled care trial comparing ISFD and best conventional management option (surgical or endovascular), as determined by the treating physician prior to randomized allocation. At least 250 patients will be recruited in at least 10 centres over a four-year period, and followed for one year, to show that ISFD can increase the incidence of successful therapy from 75 to 90% of patients, defined as complete or near-complete occlusion of the aneurysm AND a good clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at one year. The trial will be followed by an independent data safety monitoring committee to assure the safety of participants.

conclusionIntroduction of intra-saccular flow diversion can be accomplished within a care trial context.

Indexed as

StentsAgedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryPatient SafetyTreatment OutcomeCerebral aneurysmintra-saccular flow diverterrandomized trialWeb

Identifiers

PMID31690151
PMCPMC6997996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.