Trial reportInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2020
The RISE trial: A Randomized Trial on Intra-Saccular Endobridge devices.
Trial report in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microsurgical clipping versus newer endovascular techniques in treatment of unruptured anterior communicating artery-complex aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Trial
- 15 years of WEB embolization: a transformative journey in aneurysm treatment.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025Article
- MRA evaluation of aneurysms treated with woven endobridge (WEB) devices or coils: an inter- and intra-observer reliability study.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Rupture of a Previously Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm 6 Years After Treatment With the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device: Case Report.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- A new era in the treatment of wide necked bifurcation aneurysms: Intrasaccular flow disruption.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Review
- Endovascular Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge: Product Features and Selected Results of Off-Label Use.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2024Review
- The Woven EndoBridge Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Initial Clinical Experience within an Australian Population.Neurointervention · 2022Article
- Treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: Systematic review in an attempt to perform a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Postmarket American Experience With Woven EndoBridge Device: Adjudicated Multicenter Case Series.Neurosurgery · 2021Article
- Retreatments must be included in the evaluation of device performance.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) are a difficult subset of aneurysms to successfully repair endovascularly, and a number of treatment adjuncts have been designed to improve on the results of coiling, including stenting and flow diversion of the parent vessel. Surgical clipping is commonly performed for certain WNBAs, such as middle cerebral aneurysms, in some centres. Intra-saccular flow diversion (ISFD) using the Woven Endo-Bridge (WEB) or similar devices, has been developed as a new endovascular alternative to coiling for WNBAs. Meta-analyses of case series suggest satisfactory results, both in terms of safety and efficacy, but in the absence of randomized evidence, whether ISFD leads to better outcomes for patients with WNBA remains unknown. There is a need to offer ISFD within the context of a randomized care trial.
methodsThe proposed trial is a multicentre, randomized controlled care trial comparing ISFD and best conventional management option (surgical or endovascular), as determined by the treating physician prior to randomized allocation. At least 250 patients will be recruited in at least 10 centres over a four-year period, and followed for one year, to show that ISFD can increase the incidence of successful therapy from 75 to 90% of patients, defined as complete or near-complete occlusion of the aneurysm AND a good clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at one year. The trial will be followed by an independent data safety monitoring committee to assure the safety of participants.
conclusionIntroduction of intra-saccular flow diversion can be accomplished within a care trial context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.