Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31689980›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2019

Opportunities for Successful Stabilization of Poor Glass-Forming Drugs: A Stability-Based Comparison of Mesoporous Silica Versus Hot Melt Extrusion Technologies.

Felix Ditzinger, Daniel J Price, Anita Nair, Johanna Becker-Baldus, Clemens Glaubitz, Jennifer B Dressman, Christoph Saal, Martin Kuentz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix DitzingerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. felix.ditzinger@fhnw.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6418-8853
Daniel J PriceMerck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany. daniel-joseph.price@merckgroup.com.
Anita NairMerck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany. anita.nair@merckgroup.com.
Johanna Becker-BaldusInstitute for Biophysical Chemistry & Centre for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany. j.baldus@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Clemens GlaubitzInstitute for Biophysical Chemistry & Centre for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany. Glaubitz@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de.
Jennifer B DressmanInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany. dressman@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Christoph SaalMerck KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany. Christoph.Saal@merckgroup.com.
Martin KuentzInstitute of Pharma Technology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland. martin.kuentz@fhnw.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-2963-2645
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEMerck (Germany) · DEFHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 674909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amorphous formulation technologies to improve oral absorption of poorly soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) have become increasingly prevalent. Currently, polymer-based amorphous formulations manufactured by spray drying, hot melt extrusion (HME), or co-precipitation are most common. However, these technologies have challenges in terms of the successful stabilization of poor glass former compounds in the amorphous form. An alternative approach is mesoporous silica, which stabilizes APIs in non-crystalline form via molecular adsorption inside nano-scale pores. In line with these considerations, two poor glass formers, haloperidol and carbamazepine, were formulated as polymer-based solid dispersion via HME and with mesoporous silica, and their stability was compared under accelerated conditions. Changes were monitored over three months with respect to solid-state form and dissolution. The results were supported by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (SS-NMR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It was demonstrated that mesoporous silica was more successful than HME in the stabilization of the selected poor glass formers. While both drugs remained non-crystalline during the study using mesoporous silica, polymer-based HME formulations showed recrystallization after one week. Thus, mesoporous silica represents an attractive technology to extend the formulation toolbox to poorly soluble poor glass formers.

Indexed as

amorphous stabilityglass forming abilityhot melt extrusionmesoporous silicasupersaturation

Identifiers

PMID31689980
PMCPMC6920921
OpenAlexW2988427188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.