ArticleMedicine2019
Lymph node identification in skin malignancy using indocyanine green transcutaneously study: Study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03545334 (A Diagnostic Sensitivity Study Comparing Intradermal ICG and NIRFI With Intradermal Technetium 99m and Traditional Lymphoscintigraphy for Transcutaneous Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Malignant Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Diagnostic Sensitivity Study Comparing Intradermal ICG and NIRFI With Intradermal Technetium 99m and Traditional Lymphoscintigraphy for Transcutaneous Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Malignant Melanoma
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe incidence of malignant melanoma has been rising steadily over the past decades and Merkel cell carcinoma is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin tumor with a high mortality rate. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a recommended prognostic tool in primary cutaneous malignant melanomas of intermediate thickness and in all clinically node-negative Merkel cell carcinomas. The gold standard method for identification of SLNs is lymphoscintigraphy, which involves radioactive tracers. Indocyanine green-based near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRFI) has been also used for intraoperative SLN identification. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of the VisionSense VS3 NIRFI device for SNL identification. This device uses stereoscopic 3D high definition for both fluorescence and visible light imaging. Our hypothesis is that SLNs may be identified transcutaneously using fluorescent dye injections and NIRFI; therefore, obviating the need for lymphoscintigraphy in the future. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:: lymph node identification in skin malignancy using indocyanine green transcutaneously is a prospective diagnostic sensitivity study conducted at the Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery at the University Hospital Berne, Inselspital, Switzerland. The study aims at recruiting 93 patients (start date September 2017) to compare the accuracy of VisionSense VS3 camera at identifying SLNs transcutaneously with the current gold standard, lymphoscintigraphy. Moreover, a secondary objective is to determine if anatomical location of the SLN and patient factors (eg, body mass index, age) have an impact on the ability of VisionSense to detect SLNs when compared with the same gold standard. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03545334.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.