ArticleMedicine2019
Semiclosure wound therapy plus negative pressure wound therapy for an older patient with grade 4 diabetic foot with concomitant vascular occlusion: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [National expert consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds (2021 version)].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021Article
- Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds.Burns & trauma · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleGrade 4 diabetic foot (DF) is a severe infection that causes bone destruction, osteomyelitis, and osteoarticular damage, which, in turn, can lead to serious dry or wet gangrene, or amputation. DF is extremely difficult to treat. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 71-year-old female patient with long-term diabetes complicated with uremia, who undergoes regular hemodialysis 2 to 3 times per week, was admitted with grade 4 DF with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, and concomitant vascular occlusion of the lower extremities. The patient had a concurrent nutrition and electrolyte disorder. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, grade 4 DF, postamputation of the 2nd toe, vascular occlusion of the lower extremities, atherosclerosis, uremia, hypoproteinemia, and electrolyte disturbances.
interventionsTreatment with antibiotics and comprehensive measures aimed at improving nutrition and microcirculation, controlling blood glucose, as well as balancing electrolytes were performed to ameliorate the general conditions. Nibbled debridement was used to remove devitalized tissues each time to maintain as much vital cells as possible. Open therapy was used for necrotic tissues, and dressings therapy was used simultaneously for the infected lesion. This combined treatment, involving open therapy with dressing, is referred to as "semiclosure wound therapy." Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was used after a fistula formed. OUTCOMES: During the treatment procedure, the gangrene 3rd toe was spontaneously shed; the necrotic 1st toe was removed by surgery. The wound gradually healed after 3 months of open therapy combined with dressing. High location amputation was avoided. LESSONS: Semiclosure, which constitutes open therapy combined with the use of dressings, plus NPWT can preserve vital skin cells in the wound and control the aggravation of the infection. It is an effective and novel measure that prevents DF amputation in old patient and promotes wound union.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.