Observational studyMedicine2019
Evaluation of retinal function improvement in neovascular age-related macular degeneration after intravitreal aflibercept injections with the use of the assessment of retinal sensitivity: The use of the assessment of retinal sensitivity in anti-VEGF treatment - a STROBE-compliant observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Mesopic and Dark-Adapted Retinal Sensitivity With Type 1 Macular Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- A pilot study : retinal sensitivity change in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients with better baseline visual acuity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- One-Year Real-World Outcomes of Intravitreal Faricimab for Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness and Sensitivity after Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares 2 methods of macular function evaluation: the microperimetric examination (mean central retinal sensitivity and fixation stability) and the distance best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) examination, which is the most frequently used method of assessing macular function in patients with newly diagnosed wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who have been treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug (aflibercept).Prospective analysis was conducted on 44 eyes of 44 patients treated with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF (aflibercept) because of newly diagnosed neovascular AMD. According to the research protocol, all patients had a 6-month follow-up. The response to treatment was monitored functionallybyMP-1 microperimetry, fixation, and distance BCVA assessment after injection. Improvement of retinal sensitivity and BCVA was found under aflibercept treatment. There was statistically significant improvement in retinal sensitivity in the MP-1 study 3 and 6 months from the beginning of anti-VEGF therapy. Moreover, a significant improvement in retinal sensitivity between 3 and 6 months of observation was demonstrated. At the same time, up to 3 months from the beginning of treatment, BCVA improved significantly compared to the baseline value. In the 6th month of the study BCVA remained stable without further significant improvement.Microperimetric examination with medium sensitivity and fixation stability assessment is a very valuable test determining the retinal function. It is clear that examining the macular morphology itself in modern diagnostics is not enough to assess retinal function. Microperimetry technique is a valuable tool for functional long-term evaluation of retinal function (also for a period of more than 3 months).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.