Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31689718›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2019

Perceptual resolution of ambiguous neural representations for form and chromaticity.

Emily Slezak, Andrew J Coia, Steven K Shevell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Grouping ambiguous neural representations: neither identical chromaticity (the stimulus) nor color (the percept) is necessary.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily SlezakUniversity of Chicago, Department of Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew J CoiaUniversity of Chicago, Department of Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Steven K ShevellUniversity of Chicago, Department of Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Resolution of chromatic ambiguity in mid-level visionR01EY026618 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHEVELL, STEVEN K · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A coherent percept of our visual world is important for functioning. Ambiguities, however, are implicit in visual neural representations and must be resolved for stable perception of objects and scenes. Grouping processes can link multiple neurally ambiguous fragments across the visual field. Experiments here determined how multiple visual features of each fragment contribute to perceptual resolution of ambiguity by grouping. Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry, a technique for presenting competing dichoptic images, was used to induce ambiguous neural representations for equiluminant chromatic discs and gratings. Two dichoptic stimuli were presented simultaneously to measure the amount of time they both appeared the same in at least one feature domain. The two stimuli were grouped when they appeared to share ambiguous features such as color, orientation, and spatial frequency more often than chance. Experiments here tested whether unshared and unambiguous features impeded grouping of the ambiguous components. Overall, the results show that grouping can be driven by neural ambiguity that is common for fragments across the visual field, even when the fragments also have other unshared, unambiguous features.

Indexed as

AdultColor PerceptionFixation, OcularForm PerceptionHumansLightRetinal NeuronsVision, BinocularVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID31689718
PMCPMC6833983
OpenAlexW2988493382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.