ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2020
Evidence for Accelerated Biological Aging in Young Adults with Prader-Willi Syndrome.
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular markers, mechanisms and metrics of biological aging: a scoping review.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Delineating the trajectory of adult chronic diseases and healthcare use for 22q11.2 microdeletion in a general population context.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Age in Prader-Willi Syndrome and Essential Obesity: A Comparison with Chronological and Vascular Ages.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Malignancies in Prader-Willi Syndrome: Results From a Large International Cohort and Literature Review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Review
- Skin Pigmentation Abnormalities and Their Possible Relationship with Skin Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Biological Aging and Immune Senescence in Children with Perinatally Acquired HIV.Journal of immunology research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAdults with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) are at increased risk of developing age-associated diseases early in life and, like in premature aging syndromes, aging might be accelerated. We investigated leukocyte telomere length (LTL), a marker of biological age, in young adults with PWS and compared LTL to healthy young adults of similar age. As all young adults with PWS were treated with growth hormone (GH), we also compared LTL in PWS subjects to GH-treated young adults born short for gestational age (SGA).
designCross-sectional study in age-matched young adults; 47 with PWS, 135 healthy, and 75 born SGA. MEASUREMENTS: LTL measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, expressed as telomere/single copy gene ratio.
resultsMedian (interquartile range) LTL was 2.6 (2.4-2.8) at a median (interquartile range) age of 19.2 (17.7-21.3) years in PWS, 3.1 (2.9-3.5) in healthy young adults and 3.1 (2.8-3.4) in the SGA group. Median LTL in PWS was significantly lower compared to both control groups (P < .01). In PWS, a lower LTL tended to be associated with a lower total IQ (r = 0.35, P = .08). There was no association between LTL and duration of GH treatment, cumulative GH dose, or several risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular disease.
conclusionsYoung adults with PWS have significantly shorter median LTL compared to age-matched healthy young adults and GH-treated young adults born SGA. The shorter telomeres might play a role in the premature aging in PWS, independent of GH. Longitudinal research is needed to determine the influence of LTL on aging in PWS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.