Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31689314›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Manganese levels in infant formula and young child nutritional beverages in the United States and France: Comparison to breast milk and regulations.

Seth H Frisbie, Erika J Mitchell, Stéphane Roudeau, Florelle Domart, Asuncion Carmona, Richard Ortega

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Manganese exposure assessment in formula-fed infants in Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biomolecules · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Examining the effect of manganese on physiological processes: Invertebrate models.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seth H FrisbieDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Norwich University, Northfield, VT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6611-6039
Erika J MitchellBetter Life Laboratories, Incorporated, East Calais, VT, United States of America.
Stéphane RoudeauUniversity of Bordeaux, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan (CENBG), Gradignan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4539-9380
Florelle DomartUniversity of Bordeaux, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan (CENBG), Gradignan, France.
Asuncion CarmonaUniversity of Bordeaux, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan (CENBG), Gradignan, France.
Richard OrtegaUniversity of Bordeaux, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan (CENBG), Gradignan, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNorwich University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to high levels of manganese (Mn) in children has recently been associated with adverse neurodevelopmental effects. Current infant formula regulations for Mn content were set between 1981 (United States), 2006 (European Union, France), and 2007 (Codex Alimentarius) prior to the publication of much of the growing body of research on the developmental neurotoxicity of Mn. In this study, we sought to measure the concentrations of Mn in some infant formulas and young child nutritional beverages available on the United States (US) and French markets using ion beam analysis by particle induced X-ray emission (PIXE) spectrometry and then compare the analytical results to concentrations reported in the literature for breast milk and applicable infant formula regulations and guidelines. We were particularly interested in measuring Mn concentrations in product types for which there is very little data from previous surveys, especially soy-based, rice-based, goat-milk based, chocolate-flavored, and nutritional beverages for young children that are not regulated as infant or follow-on formulas (e.g. "toddler formulas" and "toddler powders"). We purchased 44 infant formulas and young child nutritional beverage products in the US and France with varying protein sources (cow-milk, goat-milk, soy, rice) labelled for birth to 3 years. We selected these samples using maximum variation sampling to explore market extremes to facilitate comparisons to regulatory limits. Since this sampling method is non-probabilistic, other inferences cannot be made beyond this set of samples to the overall markets. We used ion beam analysis to measure the concentrations of Mn in each product. The range of measured Mn concentrations in the products is 160-2,800 μg/L, substantially higher than the 3-6 μg/L mean Mn concentration reported in human breast milk. All products satisfied national and Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) international standards for minimum Mn content in infant formulas; however, 7/25 of the products purchased in the US exceeded the CAC Guidance Upper Level of 100 μg Mn/kcal for infant formula.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeveragesChild, PreschoolFranceGoatsHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornManganeseMilkMilk, HumanMilk SubstitutesOryzaSoy MilkSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionManganese

Identifiers

PMID31689314
PMCPMC6830775
OpenAlexW2986901649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.