Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31689008›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2019

Weight Stigma Among Sexual Minority Adults: Findings from a Matched Sample of Adults Engaged in Weight Management.

Rebecca M Puhl, Mary S Himmelstein, Rebecca L Pearl, Alexis C Wojtanowski, Gary D Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sociodemographic predictors of perceived weight discrimination.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca M PuhlDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-2486
Mary S HimmelsteinDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3173-1901
Rebecca L PearlCenter for Weight and Eating Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1996-0082
Alexis C WojtanowskiWW, New York, New York, USA.
Gary D FosterCenter for Weight and Eating Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Reducing Weight Stigma to Improve Long-Term Weight LossK23HL140176 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PEARL, REBECCA L · 2018 to 2022
$835k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL140176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite elevated rates of obesity among some groups of sexual minority (SM) adults, research examining weight stigma in this population is scarce.

methodsWeight stigma and weight-related health correlates were assessed in SM adults (N = 658) versus heterosexual adults (N = 658) matched on sex, race/ethnicity, age, education, and BMI. Adults enrolled in WW (formerly Weight Watchers) completed digital questionnaires assessing experienced weight stigma, weight bias internalization (WBI), weight cycling, eating self-efficacy, eating to cope, physical activity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

resultsSurvey response rates ranged from 0.8% to 3.5%. There were no differences in experienced weight stigma between SM and heterosexual participants; more than two-thirds experienced weight stigma, and more than 50% reported stigma from family, health care providers, teachers and classmates, and community members. Gay men endorsed higher WBI than heterosexual men (β = 0.22, P < 0.001). Regardless of sexual orientation, WBI was associated with poorer mental HRQOL, lower eating self-efficacy, and increased eating to cope, controlling for demographics and BMI.

conclusionsExperiencing weight stigma is as common for SM adults as heterosexual adults engaged in weight management, and WBI is associated with maladaptive eating behaviors and poor mental HRQOL. Increased attention to weight stigma and its health implications in SM populations is warranted.

Indexed as

Weight Reduction ProgramsAdultBody WeightCase-Control StudiesFemaleHeterosexualityHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightQuality of LifeSexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight Prejudice

Identifiers

PMID31689008
PMCPMC6839787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.