ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Taxonomic weighting improves the accuracy of a gap-filling algorithm for metabolic models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activity-targeted metaproteomics uncovers rare syntrophic bacteria central to anaerobic community metabolism.Nature microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- pan-Draft: automated reconstruction of species-representative metabolic models from multiple genomes.Genome biology · 2024Article
- A gap-filling algorithm for prediction of metabolic interactions in microbial communities.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe increasing availability of annotated genome sequences enables construction of genome-scale metabolic networks, which are useful tools for studying organisms of interest. However, due to incomplete genome annotations, draft metabolic models contain gaps that must be filled in a time-consuming process before they are usable. Optimization-based algorithms that fill these gaps have been developed, however, gap-filling algorithms show significant error rates and often introduce incorrect reactions.
resultsHere, we present a new gap-filling method that computes the costs of candidate gap-filling reactions from a universal reaction database (MetaCyc) based on taxonomic information. When gap-filling a metabolic model for an organism M (such as Escherichia coli), the cost for reaction R is based on the frequency with which R occurs in other organisms within the phylum of M (in this case, Proteobacteria). The assumption behind this method is that different taxonomic groups are biased toward using different metabolic reactions. Evaluation of the new gap-filler on randomly degraded variants of the EcoCyc metabolic model for E.coli showed an increase in the average F1-score to 99.0 (when using the variable weights by frequency method at the phylum level), compared to 91.0 using the previous MetaFlux gap-filler and 80.3 using a basic gap-filler. Evaluation on two other microbial metabolic models showed similar improvements. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Pathway Tools software (including MetaFlux) is free for academic use and is available at http://pathwaytools.com. Additional code for reproducing the results presented here is available at www.ai.sri.com/pkarp/pubs/taxgap/supplementary.zip. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.