Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31688570›Full record

ArticleMedical care2020

Opportunity or Burden? A Behavioral Framework for Patient Engagement.

Rachel Kimerling, Eleanor T Lewis, Sarah J Javier, Donna M Zulman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Changes in healthcare engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delineating and clarifying the concept of self-care monitoring: a concept analysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported item bank for healthcare engagement.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel KimerlingNational Center for PTSD.
Eleanor T LewisCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park.
Sarah J JavierCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park.
Donna M ZulmanCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park.
Center for Innovation · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Development of a Patient-Reported Measure to Assess Healthcare EngagementI01HX002317 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI KIMERLING, RACHEL · 2018 to 2023
–
Mental health disparities and communication among African-American VeteransI21HX001485 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELIACIN, JOHANNE · 2014 to 2014
–
HSRD VA I01 HX002317HSRD VA I21 HX001485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging patients as partners in their care is clinically appealing, yet challenging to implement, and we lack a measurement framework that is applicable to vulnerable populations. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study to refine a conceptual framework that reflects an individual's propensity to engage with care.

objectivesOur objectives were to refine the framework's domains of engagement behavior; identify key behaviors within each domain that describe engagement with providers, health systems or settings; and illustrate examples for each behavior where higher self-efficacy describes an opportunity to enhance engagement, and lower self-efficacy describes difficulties with engagement that risk burden. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SAMPLE: We elicited patient perspectives by conducting individual semistructured interviews with veterans receiving care for mental health and/or chronic conditions from the Veterans Health Administration. Data were analyzed using the framework method.

resultsThe resulting engagement framework encompassed 4 interrelated domains: Self-Management, Health Information Use, Collaborative Communication, and Healthcare Navigation. The propensity to engage with care was conceptualized as the cumulative self-efficacy to engage in behaviors across these domains. Results emphasize the collaborative nature of engagement behaviors and the impact of veteran cultural influences via perceptions of collective efficacy.

conclusionsThis framework can be applied to judgments regarding a patient's propensity to engage in care. Because self-efficacy is an individual's context-specific judgment of their capabilities, this framework may inform health care and social service interventions that aim to engage patients. This maybe especially useful for public sector settings and populations with social risks.

Indexed as

BehaviorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCommunicationComorbidityConsumer Health InformationCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID31688570
PMCPMC10226549
OpenAlexW2984095876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.