Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31688319›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

The Effect of Interphase Gap on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.

Shuman He, Lei Xu, Jeffrey Skidmore, Xiuhua Chao, Fuh-Cherng Jeng, Ruijie Wang, Jianfen Luo, Haibo Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips.Biomedical engineering online · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuman HeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lei XuDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jeffrey SkidmoreDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Xiuhua ChaoDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Fuh-Cherng JengDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.
Ruijie WangDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jianfen LuoDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Haibo WangDepartment of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Shandong University · CNNationwide Children's Hospital · USOhio University · USShandong Provincial Hospital · CNThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

NEURAL ENCODING AND AUDITORY PERCEPTION IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERSR01DC016038 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
Neural Encoding and Auditory Processing of Electrical Stimulation in Pediatric Cochlear Implant UsersR01DC017846 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2019 to 2024
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016038NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to compare the effects of increasing the interphase gap (IPG) on the neural response of the electrically stimulated cochlear nerve (CN) between children with CN deficiency (CND) and children with normal-sized CNs.

designStudy participants included 30 children with CND and 30 children with normal-sized CNs. All subjects were implanted with a Cochlear Nucleus device with the internal electrode array 24RE[CA] in the test ear. The stimulus was a charge-balanced, cathodic leading, biphasic pulse with a pulse-phase duration of 50 μsec. For each subject, the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) input/output (I/O) function was measured for 6 IPGs (i.e., 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 μsec) at 3 electrode locations across the electrode array. For each subject and each testing electrode, the highest stimulation used to measure the eCAP I/O function was the maximum comfortable level measured with an IPG of 42 μsec. Dependent variables (DVs) were the maximum eCAP amplitude, the eCAP threshold, and the slope of the eCAP I/O function estimated using both linear and sigmoidal regression functions. For each DV, the size of the IPG effect was defined as the proportional change relative to the result measured for the 7 μsec IPG at the basal electrode location. Generalized linear mixed effect models with subject group, electrode location, and IPG duration as the fixed effects and subject as the random effect were used to compare these DVs and the size of the IPG effect on these DVs.

resultsChildren with CND showed smaller maximum eCAP amplitudes, higher eCAP thresholds, and smaller slopes of eCAP I/O function estimated using either linear or sigmoidal regression function than children with normal-sized CNs. Increasing the IPG duration resulted in larger maximum eCAP amplitudes, lower eCAP thresholds and larger slopes of eCAP I/O function estimated using sigmoidal regression function at all three electrode locations in both study groups. Compared with children with normal-sized CNs, children with CND showed larger IPG effects on both the maximum eCAP amplitude and the slope of the eCAP I/O function estimated using either linear or sigmoidal regression function, and a smaller IPG effect on the eCAP threshold than those measured in children with normal-sized CNs.

conclusionsIncreasing the IPG increases responsiveness of the electrically stimulated CN in both children with CND and children with normal-sized CNs. The maximum eCAP amplitude and the slope of the eCAP I/O function measured in human listeners with poorer CN survival are more sensitive to changes in the IPG. In contrast, the eCAP threshold in listeners with poorer CN survival is less sensitive to increases in the IPG. Further studies are warranted to identify the best parameters of eCAP results for predicting CN survival before this eCAP testing paradigm can be used as a clinical tool for evaluating neural health for individual cochlear implant patients.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAction PotentialsAuditory ThresholdChildCochlear NerveElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansInterphaseMale

Identifiers

PMID31688319
PMCPMC7211427
OpenAlexW2988647436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.