Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31688211›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2020

What Are the Rates and Trends of Women Authors in Three High-impact Orthopaedic Journals from 2006-2017?

Kathryn P Hiller, Alexandre Boulos, Megan M Tran, Aristides I Cruz

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Orthopaedic Authorship: Sex-Based Resident Publication Trends.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Is There Gender Disparity in Orthopedic Surgery Resident Research Productivity?HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Gender analysis of the top classic papers in otolaryngology head and neck surgery.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Significant increase in quantity and quality of knee arthroplasty related research in KSSTA over the past 15 years.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathryn P HillerK. P. Hiller, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Alexandre BoulosA. Boulos, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Megan M TranM. M. Tran, A. I. Cruz, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Aristides I CruzM. M. Tran, A. I. Cruz, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Brown University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gender gap among authors publishing research in journals is narrowing in general medicine and various medical and surgical subspecialties. However, little is known regarding the gender gap among authors publishing research in orthopaedic journals. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the proportion of women first and last authors of original research articles in three high-impact orthopaedic journals from 2006 to 2017? (2) What is the proportion women first authors of original research by orthopaedic subspecialty from 2006 to 2017?

methodsA sample of original research publications from the even numbered months of issues of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® (CORR®), the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American volume (JBJS), and the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) were examined from 2006 to 2017. These journals were selected because of their clinical relevance, target audience, and relatively high impact factors. Over the studied period, a single author extracted and reviewed pertinent data, including the gender of the first and last authors and the primary subspecialty of the research article. The senior author refereed disputes regarding the primary subspecialty of each included article. The proportion of women first and last authors in each journal was compared between 2006 to 2017 using chi-square analysis. The proportion of women first authors according to orthopaedic subspecialty in which an article primarily focused its study was also compared between 2006 to 2017 using chi-square analysis.

resultsData were collected from 6292 articles, 13% (800) of which were first-authored by women and 10% (604) of which were last-authored by women. From 2006 to 2017, the overall percentage of women first authors in the examined journals increased (from 11% in 2006 to 17% in 2017; odds ratio 1.6563 [95 % CI 1.4945 to 1.8356]; p < 0.001). Overall across the period studied, the percentage of women first authors in JBJS was 14% while 12% of first authors in CORR and AJSM were women. Regarding subspecialty, the percentage of women first authorship ranged from 9% in the shoulder subspecialty to 21% in pediatric orthopaedics across all three journals.

conclusionsThere has been an increase in the percentage of women first authors in articles published in three high-impact orthopaedic journals from 2006 to 2017. This observed increase is encouraging in terms of promoting gender diversity in orthopaedics and may be reflective of a modest increase in the number of women entering the orthopaedic workforce. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Between 2006 and 2017, the overall number of women first authors in CORR, JBJS, and AJSM modestly increased. This may suggest a nascent narrowing of the gender gap in orthopaedics. Although this is a welcome finding in terms of promoting and encouraging gender diversity in this man-dominated field, the overall percentage of women authorship remains modest, at best. Future investigations should examine whether the modest increase in women first authorship over time found in this study translates into an increased percentage of senior/last authorship in the future, as this may have implications for women orthopaedic workforce retention.

Indexed as

AuthorshipGender EquityJournal Impact FactorBibliometricsBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansOrthopedic SurgeonsPeriodicals as TopicPhysicians, WomenTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31688211
PMCPMC7310505
OpenAlexW2983231185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.