Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31688035›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2020

Developing Health Care Organizations That Pursue Learning and Exploration of Diagnostic Excellence: An Action Plan.

Hardeep Singh, Divvy K Upadhyay, Dennis Torretti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hardeep SinghH. Singh is chief, Health Policy, Quality, and Informatics Program, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and professor of medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Divvy K UpadhyayD.K. Upadhyay is researcher-in-residence and program manager, Division of Quality, Safety and Patient Experience, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Dennis TorrettiD. Torretti is associate chief medical officer, Geisinger Medical Center, and chairman emeritus, Division of Medicine, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Decision Making and Clinical Work of Test Result Follow-up in Health IT SettingsR01HS022087 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Application of a Machine Learning to Enhance e-Triggers to Detect and Learn from Diagnostic Safety EventsR01HS027363 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2019 to 2021
$1.5M
Using Electronic Data to Improve Care of Patients with Known or Suspected CancerR18HS017820 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2008 to 2010
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022087AHRQ HHS R01 HS027363AHRQ HHS R18 HS017820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing errors in diagnosis is the next big challenge for patient safety. Diagnostic safety improvement efforts should become a priority for health care organizations, payers, and accrediting bodies; however, external incentives, policies, and practical guidance to develop these efforts are largely absent. In this Perspective, the authors highlight ways in which health care organizations can pursue learning and exploration of diagnostic excellence (LEDE). Building on current evidence and their recent experiences in developing such a learning organization at Geisinger, the authors propose a 5-point action plan and corresponding policy levers to support development of LEDE organizations. These recommendations, which are applicable to many health care organizations, include (1) implementing a virtual hub to coordinate organizational activities for improving diagnosis, such as identifying risks and prioritizing interventions that cross intra-institutional silos while promoting a culture of learning and safety; (2) participating in novel scientific initiatives to generate and translate evidence, given the rapidly evolving "basic science" of diagnostic excellence; (3) avoiding the "tyranny of metrics" by focusing on measurement for improvement rather than using measures to reward or punish; (4) engaging clinicians in activities for improving diagnosis and framing missed opportunities positively as learning opportunities rather than negatively as errors; and (5) developing an accountable culture of engaging and learning from patients, who are often underexplored sources of information. The authors also outline specific policy actions to support organizations in implementing these recommendations. They suggest this action plan can stimulate scientific, practice, and policy progress needed for achieving diagnostic excellence and reducing preventable patient harm.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersOrganizational CultureQuality ImprovementDelayed DiagnosisDelivery of Health CareDiagnosisDiagnostic ErrorsHumansMedical OverusePatient Safety

Identifiers

PMID31688035
PMCPMC7402609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.