ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2020
Developing Health Care Organizations That Pursue Learning and Exploration of Diagnostic Excellence: An Action Plan.
Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resident Physician Recognition of Tachypnea in Clinical Simulation Videos in Japan: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Charting Diagnostic Safety: Exploring Patient-Provider Discordance in Medical Record Documentation.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring Clinical Lessons Learned by Experienced Hospitalists from Diagnostic Errors and Successes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Creating a Learning Health System for Improving Diagnostic Safety: Pragmatic Insights from US Health Care Organizations.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Translating electronic health record-based patient safety algorithms from research to clinical practice at multiple sites.BMJ health & care informatics · 2022Article
- Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Use of patient complaints to identify diagnosis-related safety concerns: a mixed-method evaluation.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Article
- Perceptual Gaps Between Clinicians and Technologists on Health Information Technology-Related Errors in Hospitals: Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Safety: Needs Assessment and Informed Curriculum at an Academic Children's Hospital.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reducing errors in diagnosis is the next big challenge for patient safety. Diagnostic safety improvement efforts should become a priority for health care organizations, payers, and accrediting bodies; however, external incentives, policies, and practical guidance to develop these efforts are largely absent. In this Perspective, the authors highlight ways in which health care organizations can pursue learning and exploration of diagnostic excellence (LEDE). Building on current evidence and their recent experiences in developing such a learning organization at Geisinger, the authors propose a 5-point action plan and corresponding policy levers to support development of LEDE organizations. These recommendations, which are applicable to many health care organizations, include (1) implementing a virtual hub to coordinate organizational activities for improving diagnosis, such as identifying risks and prioritizing interventions that cross intra-institutional silos while promoting a culture of learning and safety; (2) participating in novel scientific initiatives to generate and translate evidence, given the rapidly evolving "basic science" of diagnostic excellence; (3) avoiding the "tyranny of metrics" by focusing on measurement for improvement rather than using measures to reward or punish; (4) engaging clinicians in activities for improving diagnosis and framing missed opportunities positively as learning opportunities rather than negatively as errors; and (5) developing an accountable culture of engaging and learning from patients, who are often underexplored sources of information. The authors also outline specific policy actions to support organizations in implementing these recommendations. They suggest this action plan can stimulate scientific, practice, and policy progress needed for achieving diagnostic excellence and reducing preventable patient harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.