Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31687884›Full record

Trial reportMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2020

Can inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation improve health-related quality of life in MS patients on the long term - The Danish MS Hospitals Rehabilitation Study.

Finn Boesen, Michael Nørgaard, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Thor Petersen, Brita Løvendahl, Philipp Trénel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Changes in health-related quality of life during outpatient rehabilitation: a prospective observational cohort study in four patient groups.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Finn BoesenThe Danish MS Hospitals, Haslev, Denmark.
Michael NørgaardThe Danish MS Hospitals, Haslev, Denmark.
Anders Guldhammer SkjerbækThe Danish MS Hospitals, Haslev, Denmark.
Peter Vestergaard RasmussenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thor PetersenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Brita LøvendahlThe Danish MS Hospitals, Haslev, Denmark.
Philipp TrénelDanish Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) can improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, the evidence of a long-term benefit is limited.

objectivesTo investigate the long-term effectiveness of inpatient MDR on HRQoL in MS patients.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled partial crossover trial with 427 MS patients.

resultsStatistical significant long-term improvements in HRQoL were found in three of the six outcome measures at 12-month follow-up. Three in four suggested minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were unmet.

conclusionThese results indicate that the administration of inpatient MDR may lead to long-lasting improvements in HRQoL in MS patients.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisQuality of LifeDenmarkHospitalsHumansInpatientsHealth-related quality of lifelong termmultidisciplinary rehabilitationmultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID31687884
PMCPMC7720351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.