ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2020
dGEMRIC and CECT Comparison of Cationic and Anionic Contrast Agents in Cadaveric Human Metacarpal Cartilage.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of CA4+ Impact on Mechanical Properties of Articular Cartilage.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Photon-counting in dual-contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a proof-of-concept quantitative biomechanical assessment of articular cartilage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Global research hotspots and trends of iodinated contrast agents in medical imaging: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of compositional MRI techniques to quantify the regenerative potential of articular cartilage: a preclinical minipig model after osteochondral defect treatments with autologous mesenchymal stromal cells and unseeded scaffolds.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Computed Tomography of Cartilage: An Exploration of Novel Cationic Bismuth Contrast Agent.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- A Cationic Contrast Agent in X-ray Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Pre-Clinical Evaluation of Diffusion and Attenuation Properties.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Influence of fixation on CA4+ contrast enhanced microCT of articular cartilage and subsequent feasibility for histological evaluation.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Molecular Signaling Interactions and Transport at the Osteochondral Interface: A Review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are widely used to image cartilage and their diagnostic capability is enhanced in the presence of contrast agents. The aim of the study is to directly compare the performance between commercial anionic MRI (Gd(DTPA), Gd2-) and CT (Ioxaglate, Iox1-) contrast agents with novel cationic MRI (Gd(DTPA)Lys
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.