Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31687749›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2020

Minimal Duration of Tick Attachment Sufficient for Transmission of Infectious Rickettsia rickettsii (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) by Its Primary Vector Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae): Duration of Rickettsial Reactivation in the Vector Revisited.

Michael L Levin, Shelby L Ford, Kris Hartzer, Lnna Krapiunaya, Hannah Stanley, Alyssa N Snellgrove

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms of bacterial host-to-host transmission.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Infection and immunity · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Brown Dog Tick (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of the Pathogenicity ofVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael L LevinRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Shelby L FordRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Kris HartzerRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Lnna KrapiunayaRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Hannah StanleyRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Alyssa N SnellgroveRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been reported that starving ticks do not transmit spotted fever group Rickettsia immediately upon attachment because pathogenic bacteria exist in a dormant, uninfectious state and require time for 'reactivation' before transmission to a susceptible host. To clarify the length of reactivation period, we exposed guinea pigs to bites of Rickettsia rickettsii-infected Dermacentor variabilis (Say) and allowed ticks to remain attached for predetermined time periods from 0 to 48 h. Following removal of attached ticks, salivary glands were immediately tested by PCR, while guinea pigs were observed for 10-12 d post-exposure. Guinea pigs in a control group were subcutaneously inoculated with salivary glands from unfed D. variabilis from the same cohort. In a parallel experiment, skin at the location of tick bite was also excised at the time of tick removal to ascertain dissemination of pathogen from the inoculation site. Animals in every exposure group developed clinical and pathological signs of infection. The severity of rickettsial infection in animals increased with the length of tick attachment, but even attachments for less than 8 h resulted in clinically identifiable infection in some guinea pigs. Guinea pigs inoculated with salivary glands from unfed ticks also became severely ill. Results of our study indicate that R. rickettsii residing in salivary glands of unfed questing ticks does not necessarily require a period of reactivation to precede the salivary transmission and ticks can transmit infectious Rickettsia virtually as soon as they attach to the host.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod VectorsDermacentorFemaleGuinea PigsMaleRickettsia rickettsiiRocky Mountain Spotted Fevergrace periodreactivationRickettsia rickettsiitransmission dynamics

Identifiers

PMID31687749
PMCPMC7171694
OpenAlexW2984345235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.