Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31687663›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2020

Analysis of the structural variability of topologically associated domains as revealed by Hi-C.

Natalie Sauerwald, Akshat Singhal, Carl Kingsford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A TAD Skeptic: Is 3D Genome Topology Conserved?Trends in genetics : TIG · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie SauerwaldComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9434-0940
Akshat SinghalDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11790, USA.
Carl KingsfordComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Carnegie Mellon University · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Algorithms for Managing Uncertainty in Chromosome Conformation Capture DataR01HG007104 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSFORD, CARLETON LEE · 2013 to 2015
$1.3M
Data Discovery: Computational Methods for Searching Short-Read Sequencing Experiments - Administrative SupplementR01GM122935 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KINGSFORD, CARLETON LEE · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007104NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional chromosome structure plays an integral role in gene expression and regulation, replication timing, and other cellular processes. Topologically associated domains (TADs), building blocks of chromosome structure, are genomic regions with higher contact frequencies within the region than outside the region. A central question is the degree to which TADs are conserved or vary between conditions. We analyze 137 Hi-C samples from 9 studies under 3 measures to quantify the effects of various sources of biological and experimental variation. We observe significant variation in TAD sets between both non-replicate and replicate samples, and provide initial evidence that this variability does not come from genetic sequence differences. The effects of experimental protocol differences are also measured, demonstrating that samples can have protocol-specific structural changes, but that TADs are generally robust to lab-specific differences. This study represents a systematic quantification of key factors influencing comparisons of chromosome structure, suggesting significant variability and the potential for cell-type-specific structural features, which has previously not been systematically explored. The lack of observed influence of heredity and genetic differences on chromosome structure suggests that factors other than the genetic sequence are driving this structure, which plays an important role in human disease and cellular functioning.

Identifiers

PMID31687663
PMCPMC6824515
OpenAlexW2977660404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.