Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31687604›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2019

Unfinished agenda of the neonates in developing countries: magnitude of neonatal sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Desalegne Amare, Masresha Mela, Getenet Dessie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantifying the Acute Care Costs of Neonatal Bacterial Sepsis and Meningitis in Mozambique and South Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Desalegne AmareDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Masresha MelaFelege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Getenet DessieDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeonatal sepsis is the major cause of mortality and morbidity globally, particularly in developing countries. Despite studies revealed the extent of neonatal sepsis in developing countries, the findings were inconclusive. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to determine the pooled prevalence of neonatal sepsis in developing countries.

methodsWe used a systematic review and Meta-analysis study method. The reviewed studies were accessed through an electronic web-based search strategy from the electronic database (PUBMED), advanced google scholar, different journal sites. The data extraction was done by two researchers using a data extraction table and the disparity between data extractors was resolved by the third researcher. The analysis was done using STATA version 11. The I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. The Funnel plot, Begg's test, and Egger's test were used to check for publication bias. The random-effect model was used to determine the pooled effect size. All studies related to neonatal sepsis which fulfill the inclusion criteria were considered into this study. The quality of each study was checked using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and studies graded low score were excluded from the study.

resultsAt the end, 36 articles fit with our study objectives. Studies conducted in Ethiopia were significant the source of heterogeneity of the study with a coefficient = 90, P-value = 0.025. The overall pooled prevalence of the study was 29.92%. The limitations of this study would be the authors were only used articles reported in the English language, and publication bias.

conclusionThe pooled prevalence of neonatal sepsis was found to be high which accounted for a third of the neonates. Despite countries have established possible prevention and treatment mechanisms, neonatal sepsis is the major public health problem in lower and middle-income countries till now.

Indexed as

Clinical researchDeveloping countriesEmergency medicineInfectious diseaseMeta-analysisNeonatal sepsisNeonatesPediatricsPublic healthSepsisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31687604
PMCPMC6819861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.