Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686940›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2019

Teaching students to identify and document social determinants of health.

Joy H Lewis, Kate Whelihan, Debosree Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joy H LewisDepartment of Public Health, A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Kate WhelihanDepartment of Public Health, A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Debosree RoyA.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University Arizona School of Health Sciences , Mesa, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocial determinants of health (SDH) are responsible for significant health disparities, morbidity and mortality. It is important to acculturate trainees to identify and document SDH. This can elevate their perceptions related to the importance and relevance of SDH. Documentation can encourage trainees to see SDH as factors which medical providers should address. PATIENTS AND

methodsResearchers devised a novel approach to demonstrate the value of SDH to undergraduate medical students. Proprietary diagnostic codes for SDH and procedure codes for action taken to address them, were developed. Students were encouraged to log these into electronic records for clinical encounters. Students' voluntary use of these codes was evaluated. Additionally, students were surveyed on their familiarity with the concept of SDH, their perceptions of the importance of SDH, as well as documenting SDH, twice in the study period, and results were compared. In their second year of use, proprietary codes were compared to newly available SDH related ICD-10 codes.

resultsStudents utilized proprietary codes more often than SDH related ICD-10 codes. Over 20,000 codes were logged. Comparison of survey items showed modest increases in students' positive perception about the role of SDH in patient health.

conclusionStudents' voluntary logging of SDH codes demonstrates they perceived these factors to be important and relevant to patient encounters. Future analyses will examine students' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practice patterns related to SDH.

Indexed as

constructivist learningelectronic health recordmedical educationsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31686940
PMCPMC6708880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.