Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686787›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2019

Overcoming barriers to the use of metformin: patient and provider perspectives.

James H Flory, Scott Keating, Dominique Guelce, Alvin I Mushlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James H FloryEndocrinology Service, Department of Subspecialty Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Scott KeatingDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Dominique GuelceDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Alvin I MushlinDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Cornell University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023898NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetformin is the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Observational studies show lower rates of use than would be expected from clinical guidelines.

objectiveWe undertook a qualitative study of barriers to metformin use from the patient and provider perspective.

designPatient focus group, patient individual interviews, provider interviews, and chart review. Purposive sampling of patients and providers in New York State.

participantsSeven one-on-one patient interviews, one focus group with 13 patients, 10 provider interviews, and manual review of 1259 charts. APPROACH: Grounded theory.

resultsBoth providers and patients cited potential health benefits as strong reasons to take metformin and describe it as the first-line drug for diabetes. Patients and providers both cited gastrointestinal side effects as the primary barrier to metformin use. Patients described adapting to these side effects and taking metformin at a time that minimizes them. In contrast, providers emphasized dose titration and the use of extended-release formulation as tools for minimizing side effects but were uncertain about the effectiveness of these strategies.

conclusionMetformin is positively viewed by patients and providers, but gastrointestinal side effects are a barrier to its use. There is some consensus on basic measures to improve its tolerability, but these measures are not consistently applied and lack evidence establishing their effectiveness. Pragmatic clinical trial research on optimal dose, formulation, and counseling for new metformin users should be considered.

Indexed as

adherencediabetesmetforminpharmacologyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31686787
PMCPMC6709787
OpenAlexW2969803383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.