Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686746›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2019

Efficacy and Feasibility of Chhattisgarh Balloon and Conventional Condom Balloon Tamponade: A 2-Year Prospective Study.

Nalini Mishra, Kanchan Gulabani, Sumi Agrawal, Chandrashekhar Shrivastava

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cost-effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: A systematic review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nalini MishraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. J N M Medical College and BRAM Hospital Raipur (C.G.), D-85, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.), Chhattisgarh 492001 India.
Kanchan GulabaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. J N M Medical College and BRAM Hospital Raipur (C.G.), D-85, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.), Chhattisgarh 492001 India.
Sumi AgrawalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. J N M Medical College and BRAM Hospital Raipur (C.G.), D-85, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.), Chhattisgarh 492001 India.
Chandrashekhar ShrivastavaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. J N M Medical College and BRAM Hospital Raipur (C.G.), D-85, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.), Chhattisgarh 492001 India.
Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of two types of condom uterine balloon tamponade systems, namely Chhattisgarh condom balloon device "CG balloon (CGB)" having a central drainage channel as well as indigenous tying system to fasten condom to the catheter and conventional condom uterine balloon device (C-UBT) as a second-line intervention in post-partum haemorrhage (PPH). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present non-randomised prospective case series was carried out from December 2014 to September 2016 and included 60 women having PPH which was refractory to first-line management and who were treated with either of the two condom balloon tamponade devices prepared on spot. Women with allergy to latex, retained placenta, uterine rupture, anomaly, genital infection and/or malignancy were excluded. Case report forms were filled for all participants and analysed. Primary outcome was arrest of haemorrhage, and one of the secondary outcomes was cost and consistency of the devices.

resultsCGB was used in 46 and C-UBT in 14 women. The overall success rate was 98.33%. The mean blood loss was 1417 mL. Women of C-UBT group had greater blood loss, higher inflation volume and delays due to technical issues (OR 7.6). CGB was cheaper and more consistent than C-UBT by omitting the use of suture material.

conclusionCGB and conventional condom balloon tamponade both are easy to use, feasible and efficacious for control of PPH, but CGB condom balloon device has the advantage of a central drainage lumen for real-time assessment of blood loss and therefore early corrective action.

Indexed as

CG BalloonInnovative condom balloon tamponadeLow-resource settingsMaternal mortalityPost-partum haemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID31686746
PMCPMC6801252
OpenAlexW2907804232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.