Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686742›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2019

Nitric Oxide in the Prevention of Pre-eclampsia (NOPE): A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Isosorbide Mononitrate in the Prevention of Pre-eclampsia in High-Risk Women.

G Ponmozhi, Anish Keepanasseril, Jayanthi Mathaiyan, K Manikandan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Evidence of Nitric Oxide Impairment During Hypertensive Pregnancies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G Ponmozhi1Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.
Anish Keepanasseril1Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.
Jayanthi Mathaiyan1Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.
K Manikandan1Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-4818
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INFetal Care Research Foundation · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-eclampsia contributes to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality all over the world. Endothelial dysfunction is postulated to be the crux of the pathogenesis. Recent meta-analysis of aspirin trials showed aspirin to be effective when started early in pregnancy (at ≤ 16-week gestation). We aimed to study the effect of low-dose prophylactic isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) 20 mg/day on the incidence of hypertensive diseases in high-risk women receiving standard aspirin prophylaxis.

methodsDesign: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-arm superiority trial. Setting: Antenatal clinic of a tertiary teaching hospital, South India. Participants and methods: One hundred women fulfilling NICE guideline criteria for aspirin prophylaxis recruited at 12-16 weeks were randomized to receive either 20 mg/day of ISMN or placebo, in addition to 75 mg/day of oral aspirin from recruitment till delivery. Main outcome measure: Rate of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP). Sample Size: One hundred women (50 in each arm) to detect a decrease of HDP from 20% in the placebo group to 5% in the ISMN group with a power of 80% and at 0.05.

resultsOne hundred women (50 in each arm) participated and completed the trial. Intention to treat analysis of these 100 women showed that the groups were comparable in terms of age, BMI, parity, and vascular indices (such as mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, flow-mediated vasodilatation index, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, Ankle-Brachial Index, brachial arterial stiffness index, and ankle arterial stiffness index). The rate of hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or superimposed pre-eclampsia) was not significantly different between the groups (14/50, 28% in ISMN vs. 12/50, 24% in placebo group;

conclusionThe results of the randomized controlled trial of nitric oxide in the prevention of pre-eclampsia (NOPE) showed that in high-risk women receiving standard aspirin prophylaxis from less than 16 weeks, there is no significant reduction in the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the ISMN group, to the desired extent. There was no significant effect on the severity of disease, gestational age at diagnosis of disease or maternal-perinatal morbidity due to low-dose isosorbide mononitrate.

Indexed as

AspirinIsosorbide mononitrateNitric oxideNOPEPre-eclampsiaPreventionProphylaxisRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31686742
PMCPMC6801247
OpenAlexW2794261836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.