Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686630›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2020

Traumatic Brain Injury: A Forensic Approach: A Literature Review.

Giuseppe Bertozzi, Francesca Maglietta, Francesco Sessa, Edmondo Scoto, Luigi Cipolloni, Giulio Di Mizio, Monica Salerno, Cristoforo Pomara

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Old and Promising Markers Related to Autophagy in Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Glymphatic System a Window on TBI Pathophysiology: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. MiRNA Dysregulation in Brain Injury: AnCurrent neuropharmacology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Forensic neuropathology in the past decade: a scoping literature review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe BertozziDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Francesca MagliettaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Francesco SessaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Edmondo ScotoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Luigi CipolloniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giulio Di MizioDepartment of Legal, Historical, Economic and Social Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Monica SalernoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Cristoforo PomaraDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Foggia · ITUniversity of Catania · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the principal cause of invalidity and death in the population under 45 years of age worldwide. This mini-review aims to systematize the forensic approach in neuropathological studies, highlighting the proper elements to be noted during external, radiological, autoptical, and histological examinations with particular attention paid to immunohistochemistry and molecular biology. In the light of the results of this mini-review, an accurate forensic approach can be considered mandatory in the examination of suspected TBI with medico-legal importance, in order to gather all the possible evidence to corroborate the diagnosis of a lesion that may have caused, or contributed to, death. From this point of view, only the use of an evidence-based protocol can reach a suitable diagnosis, especially in those cases in which there are other neuropathological conditions (ischemia, neurodegeneration, neuro-inflammation, dementia) that may have played a role in death. This is even more relevant when corpses, in an advanced state of decomposition, are studied, where the radiological, macroscopic and histological analyses fail to give meaningful answers. In these cases, immune-histochemical and molecular biology diagnostics are of fundamental importance and a forensic neuropathologist has to know them. Particularly, MiRNAs are promising biomarkers for TBI both for brain damage identification and for medico-legal aspects, even if further investigations are required to validate the first experimental studies. In the same way, the genetic substrate should be examined during any forensic examination, considering its importance in the outcome of TBI.

Indexed as

Forensic PathologyAutopsyBrain Injuries, TraumaticCause of DeathHumansMicroRNAsMicroRNAsautoptic approachforensic radiologyhistopathologymiRNAmolecular biologyneuropathology.Traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID31686630
PMCPMC7457403
OpenAlexW2983383662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.