Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686432›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Engaging men in HIV programmes: a qualitative study of male engagement in community-based antiretroviral refill groups in Zimbabwe.

Joanne E Mantell, Tsitsi B Masvawure, Munyaradzi Mapingure, Tsitsi Apollo, Clorata Gwanzura, Laura Block, Eleanor Bennett, Peter Preko, Godfrey Musuka, Miriam Rabkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joanne E MantellDivision of Gender, Sexuality and Health, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0748-5974
Tsitsi B MasvawureCenter for Interdisciplinary Studies, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA.
Munyaradzi MapingureICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tsitsi ApolloHIV/AIDS and STIs Unit, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Clorata GwanzuraHIV/AIDS and STIs Unit, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Laura BlockICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Eleanor BennettDivision of Gender, Sexuality and Health, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Peter PrekoICAP at Columbia University, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Godfrey MusukaICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Miriam RabkinICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Claude Ann Mellins · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
Training for Research Excellence and MeNtorship in Tuberculosis (TRENT)D43TW009539 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI METCALFE, JOHN ZAPATA · 2013 to 2022
$2.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009539NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuboptimal male engagement in HIV programmes is a persistent challenge, leading to lower coverage of HIV testing, prevention and treatment services, and to worse outcomes for men. Differentiated service delivery models, such as peer-led community antiretroviral refill groups (CARGs), offer the opportunity to enhance patient satisfaction, retention and treatment outcomes. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study to identify facilitators and barriers to CARG participation by HIV-positive men, with inputs from recipients of HIV care, community members, healthcare workers (HCWs), donors and policymakers.

methodsBetween July and October 2017, we conducted 20 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 147 adults living with HIV, including men and women enrolled in CARGs and men not enrolled in CARGs, and 46 key informant interviews (KIIs) with policymakers, donors, HCWs and community members. FGDs and KIIs were recorded, transcribed and translated. A constant comparison approach was used to triangulate findings and identify themes related to male engagement in CARGs in rural Zimbabwe.

resultsCARG participants, policymakers, donors, HCWs, and community members noted many advantages to CARG participation, including convenience, efficiency, solidarity and mutual psychosocial support. Although those familiar with CARGs reported that these groups decreased HIV-related stigma, concerns about stigma and privacy were perceived to be the primary reason for men's non-participation. Other important barriers to male enrolment included lack of awareness of CARGs, misunderstanding of how CARGs operate, few perceived benefits and lack of flexibility in CARG implementation.

conclusionsMore effective educational and awareness campaigns, community-based anti-stigma campaigns, more flexible CARG designs, and provision of financial and/or in-kind support to CARG members could mitigate many of the barriers to male enrolment in CARGs. Men may also prefer alternative differentiated service delivery models that are facility-based and/or do not require group participation.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCommunity NetworksFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMenQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSocial StigmaYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agentscommunity antiretroviral groupsdifferentiated service deliveryHIVmale engagementqualitativeZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID31686432
PMCPMC6829354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.