Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686355›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2019

Extended-FAST plus MDCT in pneumothorax diagnosis of major trauma: time to revisit ATLS imaging approach?

Stefania Ianniello, Claudia Lucia Piccolo, Margherita Trinci, Claudio A Ajmone Cat, Vittorio Miele

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Diagnostic performance of prehospital EFAST in predicting CT scan injuries in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Post-resuscitation pneumothorax: retrospective analysis of incidence, risk factors and outcome-relevance.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefania IannielloDepartment of Emergency Radiology, San Camillo Hospital-Rome, Rome, Italy. stefianni66@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2205-7393
Claudia Lucia PiccoloDepartment of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Margherita TrinciDepartment of Emergency Radiology, San Camillo Hospital-Rome, Rome, Italy.
Claudio A Ajmone CatShock and Trauma Intensive Care Unit, San Camillo Hospital-Level I Trauma Center-Rome, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio MieleDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePneumothorax (PNX) detection is of the utmost clinical relevance because it may quickly progress to cause hemodynamic instability as a consequence of invasive ventilation. Radiography is characterized by a low sensitivity to detect this disease; in recent years, chest ultrasound (US) has gained increased visibility in the diagnosis of acute respiratory emergencies including PNX. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical impact of extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (E-FAST) during the past 6 years of experience with this technique in our Level I trauma center.

methodsBetween January 2013 and December 2018, we performed a retrospective case-series study including 3320 consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department of our hospital because of major trauma. Extended-US was always performed and reported immediately after FAST during primary survey and before multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans. The presence of PNX was determined using the well-known accepted US criteria. US findings were compared with computed tomography (CT) findings, the reference standard for PNX detection.

resultsOf the 6640 lungs observed with E-FAST, there were 1244 PNX cases, while 1328 PNX cases were detected either on the basis of MDCT or on the basis of the presence of air flush during the thoracic decompression in the emergency room. Among the 84 false negatives, 12 patients had subcutaneous emphysema, 38 had a body mass index higher than 27, 6 had a thoracic wall hematoma, and 4 had chest penetrating trauma. There were 10 false positives in the diagnosis of PNX at US examination, with mild extension and not clinically significant. The overall sensitivity of E-FAST for PNX detection was 93.6% (1244/1328), the specificity of E-FAST was 99.8% (5312/5322), the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.4% (5312/5396), and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 99.2% (1328/1338).

conclusionOur results demonstrate that bedside thoracic US is characterized by a very good accuracy in the diagnostic work-up of major trauma patients, even in difficult conditions, allowing rapid diagnosis of PNX. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The novelty of this research lies in the possibility of diagnosing potential life-threatening conditions in a very short time by means of US, thus proposing a revision of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines in order to incorporate it in the work-up of high-energy injured patients.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumothoraxPoint-of-Care TestingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedTrauma CentersWounds and InjuriesAdvanced trauma life supportExtended-FASTMajor traumaPneumothoraxThoracic ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31686355
PMCPMC6838249
OpenAlexW2988907851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.