Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31686300›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2020

A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.

Ayaka Sakai, Yuya Onishi, Misaki Matsui, Hidetoshi Adachi, Atsushi Teramoto, Kuniaki Saito, Hiroshi Fujita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ayaka SakaiSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Yuya OnishiGraduate School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Misaki MatsuiAoyama Hospital, 100-1 Douji, Kosakai, Toyokawa, Aichi, 441-0195, Japan.
Hidetoshi AdachiAoyama Hospital, 100-1 Douji, Kosakai, Toyokawa, Aichi, 441-0195, Japan.
Atsushi TeramotoSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. teramoto@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-5348
Kuniaki SaitoSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Hiroshi FujitaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 26108005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In digital mammography, which is used for the early detection of breast tumors, oversight may occur due to overlap between normal tissues and lesions. However, since digital breast tomosynthesis can acquire three-dimensional images, tissue overlapping is reduced, and, therefore, the shape and distribution of the lesions can be easily identified. However, it is often difficult to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions on images, and the diagnostic accuracy can be reduced due to complications from radiological interpretations, owing to acquisition of a higher number of images. In this study, we developed an automated classification method for diagnosing breast lesions on digital breast tomosynthesis images using radiomics to comprehensively analyze the radiological images. We extracted an analysis area centered on the lesion and calculated 70 radiomic features, including the shape of the lesion, existence of spicula, and texture information. The accuracy was compared by inputting the obtained radiomic features to four classifiers (support vector machine, random forest, naïve Bayes, and multi-layer perceptron), and the final classification result was obtained as an output using a classifier with high accuracy. To confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method, we used 24 cases with confirmed pathological diagnosis on biopsy. We also compared the classification results based on the presence or absence of dimension reduction using least absolute shrinkage and a selection operator (LASSO). As a result, when the support vector machine was used as a classifier, the correct identification rate of the benign tumors was 55% and that of malignant tumors was 84%, with best results. These results indicate that the proposed method may help in more accurately diagnosing cases that are difficult to classify on images.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBreastBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammographyPattern Recognition, AutomatedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSupport Vector MachineBreast cancerImage analysisRadiomicsTomosynthesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.