ArticleRadiological physics and technology2020
A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep learning, radiomics and radiogenomics applications in the digital breast tomosynthesis: a systematic review.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Pooled it
- Preoperative Prediction Power of Radiomics for Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- An automatic classification of breast cancer using fuzzy scoring based ResNet CNN model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Combining shallow and deep neural networks on pseudo-color enhanced images for digital breast tomosynthesis lesion classification.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- An updated overview of radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Review
- Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Review
- Preoperative assessment of grade, T stage, and lymph node involvement: machine learning-based CT texture analysis in colon cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Review
- How Radiomics Can Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Clinical-radiomic models based on digital breast tomosynthesis images: a preliminary investigation of a predictive tool for cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Radiomic Applications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis of BI-RADS Category 4 Calcifications Sent for Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- A predictive algorithm using clinical and laboratory parameters may assist in ruling out and in diagnosing MDS.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation.Cancer medicine · 2021Review
- Radiomic Evaluations of the Diagnostic Performance of DM, DBT, DCE MRI, DWI, and Their Combination for the Diagnosisof Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Will traditional biopsy be substituted by radiomics and liquid biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis and characterisation?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In digital mammography, which is used for the early detection of breast tumors, oversight may occur due to overlap between normal tissues and lesions. However, since digital breast tomosynthesis can acquire three-dimensional images, tissue overlapping is reduced, and, therefore, the shape and distribution of the lesions can be easily identified. However, it is often difficult to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions on images, and the diagnostic accuracy can be reduced due to complications from radiological interpretations, owing to acquisition of a higher number of images. In this study, we developed an automated classification method for diagnosing breast lesions on digital breast tomosynthesis images using radiomics to comprehensively analyze the radiological images. We extracted an analysis area centered on the lesion and calculated 70 radiomic features, including the shape of the lesion, existence of spicula, and texture information. The accuracy was compared by inputting the obtained radiomic features to four classifiers (support vector machine, random forest, naïve Bayes, and multi-layer perceptron), and the final classification result was obtained as an output using a classifier with high accuracy. To confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method, we used 24 cases with confirmed pathological diagnosis on biopsy. We also compared the classification results based on the presence or absence of dimension reduction using least absolute shrinkage and a selection operator (LASSO). As a result, when the support vector machine was used as a classifier, the correct identification rate of the benign tumors was 55% and that of malignant tumors was 84%, with best results. These results indicate that the proposed method may help in more accurately diagnosing cases that are difficult to classify on images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31686300What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.