ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2019
Model-guided mechanism discovery and parameter selection for directed evolution.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Highly multiplexed design of an allosteric transcription factor to sense new ligands.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Highly multiplexed design of an allosteric transcription factor to sense novel ligands.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Engineering ligand-specific biosensors for aromatic amino acids and neurochemicals.Cell systems · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Directed evolution is frequently applied to identify genetic variants with improvements in a single or multiple properties. When used to improve multiple properties simultaneously, a common strategy is to apply alternating rounds of selection criteria to enrich for variants with each desirable trait. In particular, counterselection, or selection against undesired traits rather than for desired ones, has been successfully employed in many studies. Although the sequence and stringency of alternating selective pressures for different traits are known to be highly consequential for the outcome of the screen, the effects of these parameters have not been systematically evaluated. We developed a method for producing a statistical modeling framework to elucidate these effects. The model uses single-cell fluorescence intensity distributions to estimate the proportions of phenotypic populations within a library and then predicts the changes in these proportions depending on specified positive selective or counterselective pressures. We validated the approach using recently described systems for metabolite-responsive bacterial transcription factors and yeast G-protein-coupled receptors. Finally, we applied the model to identify biological sources that exert undesirable selective pressure on libraries during sorting. Notably, these pressures produce substantial artifacts that, if unaddressed, can lead to failure of the screen. This method for model generation can be applied to FACS-based directed evolution experiments to create a quantitative framework that identifies subtle population effects. Such models can guide the choice of experimental design parameters to better enrich for true positive genetic variants and improve the chance of successful directed evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.