Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31685987›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2019

Epigenetic remodelling licences adult cholangiocytes for organoid formation and liver regeneration.

Luigi Aloia, Mikel Alexander McKie, Grégoire Vernaz, Lucía Cordero-Espinoza, Niya Aleksieva, Jelle van den Ameele, Francesco Antonica, Berta Font-Cunill, Alexander Raven, Riccardo Aiese Cigliano and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New developments and applications of human organoids.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Influencing factors and mechanism of hepatocyte regeneration.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Luigi Aloia *The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-2730
Mikel Alexander McKie *The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-4034
Grégoire Vernaz *The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8942-2370
Lucía Cordero-EspinozaThe Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Niya AleksievaMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jelle van den AmeeleThe Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-0810
Francesco AntonicaDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-9689
Berta Font-CunillThe Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alexander RavenMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Riccardo Aiese CiglianoSequentia Biotech SL, Barcelona, Spain.
German BelenguerThe Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Richard L MortDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK.
Andrea H BrandThe Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Magdalena Zernicka-GoetzDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7004-2471
Stuart J ForbesMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-2561
Eric A MiskaThe Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-576X
Meritxell HuchThe Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. huch@mpi-cbg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1545-5265
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GBMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GBCalifornia Institute of Technology · USLancaster University · GBSOM Biotech (Spain) · ES

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18583Cancer Research UK A14492Cancer Research UK A18583European Research Council 669198Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Medical Research Council MR/P016839/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/R001162/1Wellcome Trust 092096Wellcome Trust 103792Wellcome Trust 104151Wellcome Trust 104640Wellcome Trust 105839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following severe or chronic liver injury, adult ductal cells (cholangiocytes) contribute to regeneration by restoring both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. We recently showed that ductal cells clonally expand as self-renewing liver organoids that retain their differentiation capacity into both hepatocytes and ductal cells. However, the molecular mechanisms by which adult ductal-committed cells acquire cellular plasticity, initiate organoids and regenerate the damaged tissue remain largely unknown. Here, we describe that ductal cells undergo a transient, genome-wide, remodelling of their transcriptome and epigenome during organoid initiation and in vivo following tissue damage. TET1-mediated hydroxymethylation licences differentiated ductal cells to initiate organoids and activate the regenerative programme through the transcriptional regulation of stem-cell genes and regenerative pathways including the YAP-Hippo signalling. Our results argue in favour of the remodelling of genomic methylome/hydroxymethylome landscapes as a general mechanism by which differentiated cells exit a committed state in response to tissue damage.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeTranscriptomeAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsBile DuctsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationEpithelial CellsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHippo Signaling PathwayLiverLiver RegenerationMaleAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsTET1 protein, mouseYap1 protein, mouseYAP-Signaling Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31685987
PMCPMC6940196
OpenAlexW2986073722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.