Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31685931›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Quantitative evaluation of digital-image enhancement during heads-up surgery.

Kunihiko Akiyama, Ken Watanabe, Masaki Fukui, Hiroshi Higuchi, Toru Noda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kunihiko AkiyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, 2-5-1, Higashigaoka, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8902, Japan. akiyama.kunihiko.gs@mail.hosp.go.jp.
Ken WatanabeDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, 2-5-1, Higashigaoka, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8902, Japan.
Masaki FukuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, 2-5-1, Higashigaoka, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8902, Japan.
Hiroshi HiguchiSony Corporation, 1-7-1, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan.
Toru NodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, 2-5-1, Higashigaoka, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8902, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-processing is an advantage of heads-up surgery and expected to facilitate ophthalmic surgeries. To evaluate image-processing quantitatively, we analyzed the surgical images of twenty eyes that underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling assisted by Brilliant Blue G (BBG). Still images of the peeling procedure were obtained from the surgical video, and the color difference was calculated between two adjacent spots inside and outside the ILM-peeling contour, i.e., without and with BBG staining, respectively. The color differences were compared between the two settings with and without image-processing, delivered by an algorithm to enhance the color and contrast. Color differences were calculated using two methods: the Euclidean distance based on RGB values (RGB distance) and the Delta-E00 formula provided by the International Commission on Illumination. In five cases, minimum light intensities required to recognize the contour of ILM-peeling were compared during surgeries between the two settings with and without enhancement. Image-processing increased the mean color difference significantly (P < 0.001) from 15.47 and 4.49 to 34.03 and 8.00, respectively, for the RGB distance and Delta-E00. The minimum light intensity was reduced from 15 to 5 on average by image-enhancement. These results showed image-processing enhances color differences and reduces light intensities during vitrectomy.

Identifiers

PMID31685931
PMCPMC6828699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.