ArticleScientific reports2019
Tradeoffs in the value of biodiversity feature and cost data in conservation prioritization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guiding stakeholder negotiations in data-poor coastal planning with open-access spatial data.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Establishing new grid-size-dependent attributes to rank areas of endemism for conservation priorities.Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2025Article
- Opportunity cost estimates for spatial conservation prioritisation across terrestrial Europe.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Systematic conservation prioritization with the prioritizr R package.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Assessing evidence on the impacts of nature-based interventions for climate change mitigation: a systematic map of primary and secondary research from subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions.Environmental evidence · 2023Article
- Economic value of three grassland ecosystem services when managed at the regional and farm scale.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Narrowly distributed taxa are disproportionately informative for conservation planning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-support tools are commonly used to maximize return on investments (ROI) in conservation. We evaluated how the relative value of information on biodiversity features and land cost varied with data structure and variability, attributes of focal species and conservation targets, and habitat suitability thresholds for contrasting bird communities in the Pacific Northwest of North America. Specifically, we used spatial distribution maps for 20 bird species, land values, and an integer linear programming model to prioritize land units (1 km
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.