Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31685853›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

An Exploratory Study of Predictors of Response to Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired with Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke.

David Alexander Dickie, Teresa Jacobson Kimberley, David Pierce, Navzer Engineer, W Brent Tarver, Jesse Dawson

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02243020 nacompletednot on this map

Study MT-St-02 - Stroke - A Randomized Pilot Study Assessing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) During Rehabilitation for Improved Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke (MicroTransponder's Vivistim System)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMicroTransponder Inc.Ran2014 to 2022Enrolled17ConditionsStroke, Upper Limb DeficitsArmsVagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS)
NCT06722677 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-Center, Triple-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Rehabilitation Paired with Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor Function in Patients with Ischemic Stroke (Repair Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Pins Medical Co., LtdRan2024 to 2025Enrolled99ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Upper Extremity ParesisArmsVNS, Sham VNS, Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Mapping the role of vagus nerve stimulation in post-stroke arm motor recovery.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David Alexander DickieInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom. david.dickie@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-8403
Teresa Jacobson KimberleySchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown Navy Yard, 36 1st Avenue, Boston, MA, 02129, United States.
David PierceMicroTransponder, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Navzer EngineerMicroTransponder, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
W Brent TarverMicroTransponder, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Jesse DawsonInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously shown the safety and feasibility of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with upper-limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke. In this exploratory study, we assessed whether clinical and brain MRI variables predict response to treatment. We used data from two completed randomised and blinded clinical trials (N = 35). All participants had moderate to severe upper-limb weakness and were randomised to 6-weeks intensive physiotherapy with or without VNS. Participants had 3 T brain MRI at baseline. The primary outcome was change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment, upper-extremity score (FMA-UE) from baseline to the first day after therapy completion. We used general linear regression to identify clinical and brain MRI predictors of change in FMA-UE. VNS-treated participants had greater improvement in FMA-UE at day-1 post therapy than controls (8.63 ± 5.02 versus 3.79 ± 5.04 points, t = 2.83, Cohen's d = 0.96, P = 0.008). Higher cerebrospinal fluid volume was associated with less improvement in FMA-UE in the control but not VNS group. This was also true for white matter hyperintensity volume but not after removal of an outlying participant from the control group. Responders in the VNS group had more severe arm impairment at baseline than responders to control. A phase III trial is now underway to formally determine whether VNS improves outcomes and will explore whether these differ in people with more severe baseline upper-limb disability and cerebrovascular disease.

Indexed as

Vagus Nerve StimulationAdultAgedBrainDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID31685853
PMCPMC6828969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.