ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2019
[Validation of the "Palliative Care Difficulties Scale (PCDS)" questionnaire in the spanish population about health professionals´ difficulties in palliative care].
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of palliative care difficulties scale.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveKnowing the difficulties in the application of palliative care would allow us to propose improvement strategies. The objective was to determine the metric properties of the Palliative Care Difficulties Scale (PCDS) translated and adapted to Spanish.
methodsAn instrumental validation study was designed in a regional hospital and primary care centers of a health district. 148 health professionals participated. Sociodemographic and professional variables were collected by a questionnaire about palliative care training and experience, as well as items from the PCDS. The statistical analysis was done with the SPSS 19.0 program.
resultsIt was verified the comprehension of the translation and back translation of the questionnaire, in a pilot study with 30 professionals. Subsequently, in the survey of 118 professionals, an endorsement frequency of not more than 51% was found for content validity. As for the construct validity, the calculation of the sample adequacy, using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index obtained a value of 0.76. The principal component factor analysis reached a total variance of 73.88% with all items. The correlation of factors ranged from 0.2 to 0.3; so the Varimax rotation was established. The correlation between the items of each factor was higher than 0.6. For the reliability analysis, the internal consistency obtained a Cronbach alpha value of 0.87. In the test-retest reliability analysis, Spearman's Rho correlation for the scale was 0.81.
conclusionsIt was obtained an instrument translated and culturally adapted to Spanish, with adequate validity and reliability to measure difficulties in palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31685791PMC11582799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.