Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31685674›Full record

RevieweNeuro

Pushing the Boundaries of Psychiatric Neuroimaging to Ground Diagnosis in Biology.

Manish Saggar, Lucina Q Uddin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Considerations for conducting developmental neuroimaging research on mental health topics.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Connectome-based fingerprinting: reproducibility, precision, and behavioral prediction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manish SaggarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 saggar@stanford.edu.
Lucina Q UddinDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124.ORCID 0000-0003-2278-8962

Funding

Cognitive and Neural Flexibility in AutismR01MH107549 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI UDDIN, LUCINA QAZI · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Only time will tell: a computational psychiatry approach to model temporal transitions in brain activity as a lens towards developing better diagnostic nosology for psychiatric illnessDP2MH119735 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
Quantifying the Fluctuations of Intrinsic Brain Activity in Healthy and Patient PopulationsR00MH104605 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2017 to 2019
$747k
NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH119735NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH104605NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To accurately detect, track progression of, and develop novel treatments for mental illnesses, a diagnostic framework is needed that is grounded in biological features. Here, we present the case for utilizing personalized neuroimaging, computational modeling, standardized computing, and ecologically valid neuroimaging to anchor psychiatric nosology in biology.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHumansMental DisordersNeuroimagingcomputational modelingdiagnosisneuroimagingpsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID31685674
PMCPMC6860983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.