ArticleRadiologic technology2019
PET-CT for Evaluating Breast Cancer Yields Incidental Finding in the Lung.
Article in Radiologic technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synchronous Malignancies Identified by PET-CT Scan in Breast Cancer Patients.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA woman aged 75 years presented with a palpable left axillary lymph node. Mammography showed a spiculated mass in the left breast, demonstrated by biopsy to be triple-negative breast cancer. A positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan was performed to evaluate the extent of the cancer and revealed an unrelated nonmetastatic, synchronous carcinoid in the left lung. The patient was a nonsmoker and presented with no symptoms of lung disease. DISCUSSION: Advanced imaging modalities used to evaluate the extent of locally advanced breast cancer have been a keystone in decreasing cancer mortality rates. Mammography is considered the gold standard for breast disease evaluation, but sonography is a valuable modality for correlating suspicious findings and evaluating lesions that might not be visible on mammograms. When a breast biopsy confirms metastasis to the axillary lymph nodes, PET-CT is the modality of choice for cancer staging and ruling out distant metastases.
conclusionImaging tools used to evaluate breast cancer can help determine whether distant metastasis has occurred and in rare cases can help discover other primary cancers. The patient in this case study was 1 of the few patients with an incidental finding of a second nonmetastatic primary malignancy in the lung detected using PET-CT. The risks associated with advanced imaging include exposing patients to additional tests and potentially invasive procedures based on the results. However, in some instances, imaging results can alter the treatment plan and increase survival rates. Further empirical research and case studies are needed to identify clinical outcomes for patients with a second primary cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31685588PMC7561062W2989998966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.