Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31685541›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Detection of frailty in older patients using a mobile app: cross-sectional observational study in primary care.

Vanessa Aznar-Tortonda, Antonio Palazón-Bru, David Manuel Folgado-de la Rosa, Virginia Espínola-Morel, Bierca Fermina Pérez-Pérez, Ana Belén León-Ruiz, Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The association of frailty with health care costs using the FRAIL scale.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The relevance of mobile applications helping in doctor-patient relationships.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa Aznar-TortondaNational Institute of Social Security, Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Palazón-BruDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
David Manuel Folgado-de la RosaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Virginia Espínola-MorelNational Institute of Social Security, Valencia, Spain.
Bierca Fermina Pérez-PérezElche, Alicante, Spain.
Ana Belén León-RuizEmergency Service, Marina Baixa Hospital, La Vila Joiosa, Alicante, Spain.
Vicente Francisco Gil-GuillénDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESHospital General Universitario de Elche · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main instruments used to assess frailty are the Fried frailty phenotype and the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, and Loss of Weight (FRAIL) scale. Both instruments contain items that must be obtained in a personal interview and cannot be used with an electronic medical record only.

aimTo develop and internally validate a prediction model, based on a points system and integrated in an application (app) for Android, to predict frailty using only variables taken from a patient's clinical history. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional observational study undertaken across the Valencian Community, Spain.

methodA sample of 621 older patients was analysed from January 2017 to May 2018. The main variable was frailty measured using the FRAIL scale. Candidate predictors were: sex, age, comorbidities, or clinical situations that could affect daily life, polypharmacy, and hospital admission in the last year. A total of 3472 logistic regression models were estimated. The model with the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was selected and adapted to the points system. This system was validated by bootstrapping, determining discrimination (AUC), and calibration (smooth calibration).

resultsA total of 126 (20.3%) older people were identified as being frail. The points system had an AUC of 0.78 and included as predictors: sex, age, polypharmacy, hospital admission in the last year, and diabetes. Calibration was satisfactory.

conclusionA points system was developed to predict frailty in older people using parameters that are easy to obtain and recorded in the clinical history. Future research should be carried out to externally validate the constructed model.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleProportional Hazards ModelsSpainfrail elderlyfrailtygeneral practicemobile applicationsstatistical models

Identifiers

PMID31685541
PMCPMC6833916
OpenAlexW2984824576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.